The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings

A practical methodology is presented for creating closeness in an experimental context. Whether or not an individual is in a relationship, particular pairings of individuals in the relationship, and circumstances of relationship development become manipulated variables. Over a 45-min period subject pairs carry out self-disclosure and relationship-building tasks that gradually escalate in intensity. Study 1 found greater postinteraction closeness with these tasks versus comparable small-talk tasks. Studies 2 and 3 found no significant closeness effects, inspite of adequate power, for (a) whether pairs were matched for nondisagreement on important attitudes, (b) whether pairs were led to expect mutual liking, or (c) whether getting close was made an explicit goal. These studies also illustrated applications for addressing theoretical issues, yielding provocative tentative findings relating to attachment style and introversion/extraversion.

[1]  E. Erikson.  Childhood and Society , 1965 .

[2]  L. Lunsky.  Childhood and Society. , 1965 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[5]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[6]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1975 .

[7]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[8]  C. Rusbult.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements , 2022 .

[9]  J. Gottman,et al.  Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[12]  J. Gottman,et al.  Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[14]  M. Clark,et al.  Differences in Social Exchange Between Intimate and Other Relationships: Gradually Evolving or Quickly Apparent? , 1986 .

[15]  V. Derlega,et al.  Friendship and Social Interaction , 1986 .

[16]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. , 1986 .

[17]  A. Thorne.  The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. , 1987 .

[18]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Reasons for Changes in Commitment: Variations by Courtship Type , 1987 .

[20]  A. Aron,et al.  Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. , 1988 .

[21]  D. McAdams,et al.  Personal needs and personal relationships , 1988 .

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The analysis of data from two-person relationships. , 1988 .

[23]  L. Acitelli.  When Spouses Talk to Each Other about their Relationship , 1988 .

[24]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Perspectives on marital interaction , 1988 .

[25]  H. Reis,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process. , 1988 .

[26]  A. Christensen.  Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. , 1988 .

[27]  J. Asendorpf.  Shyness as a Final Common Pathway for Two Different Kinds of Inhibition , 1989 .

[28]  Stephen R. Hotard,et al.  Interactive effects of extraversion, neuroticism, and social relationships on subjective well-being. , 1989 .

[29]  Donald G. Dutton,et al.  Experiences of Falling in Love , 1989 .

[30]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[31]  William Ickes,et al.  Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. , 1990 .

[32]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[33]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[35]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[36]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[38]  S. Duck,et al.  Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. , 1998 .