Alternative EUV mask technology to compensate for mask 3D effects

Traditional EUV masks, with absorber on top of the multi-layer (ML) mirror, generally suffer from mask 3D effects: H/V shadowing, best focus shifts through pitch and pattern shifts through focus. These effects reduce the overlapping process window, complicate optical proximity correction and generate overlay errors. With further pitch scaling, these mask 3D effects are expected to become stronger, increasing the need for a compensation strategy. In this study, we have proven by simulations and experiments that alternative mask technologies can lower mask 3D effects and therefore have the potential to improve the imaging of critical EUV layers. We have performed an experimental imaging study of a prototype Etched ML mask, which has recently become available. This prototype alternative mask has only half the ML mirror thickness (20 Mo/Si pairs) and contains no absorber material at all. Instead, the ML mirror is etched away to the substrate at the location of the dark features. For this Etched ML mask, we have compared the imaging performance for mask 3D related effects to that of a standard EUV mask, using wafer exposures at 0.33 NA. Experimental data are compared to the simulated predictions and the benefits and drawbacks of such an alternative mask are shown. Besides the imaging performance, we will also discuss the manufacturability challenges related to the etched ML mask technology.

[1]  Thomas Schmoeller,et al.  The impact of mask design on EUV imaging , 2009, Photomask Japan.

[2]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Mask aspects of EUVL imaging at 27nm node and below , 2011, Photomask Technology.

[3]  Vicky Philipsen,et al.  Actinic characterization and modeling of the EUV mask stack , 2013, Other Conferences.

[4]  Norihito Fukugami,et al.  Experimental approach to EUV imaging enhancement by mask absorber height optimization , 2013, Other Conferences.

[5]  Sascha Migura,et al.  EUV lithography scanner for sub-8nm resolution , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Winfried Kaiser,et al.  Interactions of 3D mask effects and NA in EUV lithography , 2012, Photomask Technology.

[7]  Yasutaka Morikawa,et al.  Capability of etched multilayer EUV mask fabrication , 2014, Photomask Technology.

[8]  Naoya Hayashi,et al.  Patterning of EUVL binary etched multilayer mask , 2013, Photomask Technology.

[9]  Jens Timo Neumann,et al.  Modeling studies on alternative EUV mask concepts for higher NA , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Obert R. Wood,et al.  Architectural choices for EUV lithography masks: patterned absorbers and patterned reflectors , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Bruno M. La Fontaine,et al.  Rigorous EM simulation of the influence of the structure of mask patterns on EUVL imaging , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Comparative study of mask architectures for EUV lithography , 2004, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[13]  Martin Burkhardt,et al.  Best focus shift mechanism for thick masks , 2015, Advanced Lithography.