Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge

Abstract The Tanaro Bridge, an 18 span masonry bridge built in 1866, has been investigated both in service conditions and at different stages of its demolition. A comparative characterization of the brickwork was performed by means of compressive tests on cylinders, flat jacks, sonic and sclerometer tests, while the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the bridge and the brickwork damping have been identified by dynamic tests on the bridge. Data from material testing were used to set up FEM models, so that the reliability of the material characterization procedures is demonstrated by comparison between the dynamic tests and FEM results. A rational comparative analysis of the results showed that: (i) a large part of the bridge needs to be monitored if the mode shapes are to be identified through dynamic tests; (ii) elastic FEM models can provide some information on the bridge response under service loads provided the mechanical parameters are adequately identified. Besides, some information has been deduced on the effectiveness, in service conditions, of some retrofitting technique: (i) transversal tie bars through the arch thickness have been proved almost ineffective; (ii) internal spandrels were found to be quite efficient in connecting adjacent spans.

[1]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Longitudinal and transverse effects in masonry arch assessment , 2001 .

[2]  A. Brencich,et al.  Compressive strength of solid clay brick masonry: calibration of experimental tests and theoretical issues , 2006 .

[3]  Maria Rosa Valluzzi,et al.  Structural investigations and analyses for the conservation of the ‘Arsenale’ of Venice , 2002 .

[4]  R J Bridle,et al.  AN ENERGY METHOD FOR ARCH BRIDGE ANALYSIS. , 1990 .

[5]  Theodore V. Galambos,et al.  Probability-based criteria for structural design , 1982 .

[6]  M A Crisfield,et al.  A MECHANISM PROGRAM FOR COMPUTING THE STRENGTH OF MASONRY ARCH BRIDGES BY M.A. CRISFIELD AND A.J. PACKHAM , 1987 .

[7]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Load testing and model simulations for a stone arch bridge , 2005 .

[8]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF HISTORIC MASONRIES , 2000 .

[9]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Application of arma models to estimate earthquake ground motion and structural response , 1995 .

[10]  Jacques Heyman,et al.  The masonry arch , 1982 .

[11]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges , 2001 .

[12]  Climent Molins,et al.  CAPACITY OF MASONRY ARCHES AND SPATIAL FRAMES , 1998 .

[13]  M A Crisfield,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT AND MECHANISM METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MASONRY AND BRICKWORK ARCHES , 1985 .

[14]  Antonio Brencich,et al.  Masonry Arches: Historical Rules and Modern Mechanics , 2007 .

[15]  Luigi Gambarotta,et al.  Collapse analysis of masonry bridges taking into account arch–fill interaction , 2005 .

[16]  Antonio Brencich,et al.  Assessment of Multispan Masonry Arch Bridges. I: Simplified Approach , 2004 .

[17]  B. S. Choo,et al.  FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF MASONRY ARCH BRIDGES USING TAPERED ELEMENTS. , 1991 .

[18]  M J Blackler,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE UK MASONRY ARCH ASSESSMENT METHODS. , 1997 .

[19]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures , 2018, Design of Structural Elements.

[20]  Aw Page,et al.  THE BIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF BRICK MASONRY. , 1981 .

[21]  T. G. Hughes,et al.  Quasi-static and high cycle fatigue strength of brick masonry , 2006 .

[22]  Thomas E. Boothby,et al.  Service Load Response of Masonry Arch Bridges , 1998 .