Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography.

PURPOSE To evaluate two methods for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography (CT)--the metal deletion technique (MDT) and the selective algebraic reconstruction technique (SART)--and compare these methods with filtered back projection (FBP) and linear interpolation (LI). MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study; informed patient consent was waived. Simulated projection data were calculated for a phantom that contained water, soft tissue, bone, and iron. Clinical projection data were obtained retrospectively from 11 consecutively identified CT scans with metal streak artifacts, with a total of 178 sections containing metal. Each scan was reconstructed using FBP, LI, SART, and MDT. The simulated scans were evaluated quantitatively by calculating the average error in Hounsfield units for each pixel compared with the original phantom. Two radiologists who were blinded to the reconstruction algorithms used qualitatively evaluated the clinical scans, ranking the overall severity of artifacts for each algorithm. P values for comparisons of the image quality ranks were calculated from the binomial distribution. RESULTS The simulations showed that MDT reduces artifacts due to photon starvation, beam hardening, and motion and does not introduce new streaks between metal and bone. MDT had the lowest average error (76% less than FBP, 42% less than LI, 17% less than SART). Blinded comparison of the clinical scans revealed that MDT had the best image quality 100% of the time (95% confidence interval: 72%, 100%). LI had the second best image quality, and SART and FBP had the worst image quality. On images from two CT scans, as compared with images generated by the scanner, MDT revealed information of potential clinical importance. CONCLUSION For a wide range of scans, MDT yields reduced metal streak artifacts and better-quality images than does FBP, LI, or SART. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101782/-/DC1.

[1]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Novel approximate approach for high-quality image reconstruction in helical cone-beam CT at arbitrary pitch , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[3]  P. Suetens,et al.  Metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography: a simulation study , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[4]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[6]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[7]  J. Hsieh,et al.  An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. , 2000, Medical physics.

[8]  P M Joseph,et al.  The exponential edge-gradient effect in x-ray computed tomography. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Yiannis Kyriakou,et al.  Reducing Metal Artifacts in Computed Tomography Caused by Hip Endoprostheses Using a Physics-Based Approach , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[10]  J. Hsieh.  Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  P M Joseph,et al.  The effects of scatter in x-ray computed tomography. , 1982, Medical physics.

[12]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[13]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  A novel forward projection-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector computed tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Tobias Funk,et al.  Computed Tomographic Metal Artifact Reduction for the Detection and Quantitation of Small Features Near Large Metallic Implants: A Comparison of Published Methods , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Reduction of metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm , 1999 .

[16]  R. Walle,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[17]  D Verhoeven,et al.  Limited-data computed tomography algorithms for the physical sciences. , 1993, Applied optics.

[18]  D. Robertson,et al.  Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.