Methanosarcinaceae and Acetate-Oxidizing Pathways Dominate in High-Rate Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge

ABSTRACT This study investigated the process of high-rate, high-temperature methanogenesis to enable very-high-volume loading during anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Reducing the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 15 to 20 days in mesophilic digestion down to 3 days was achievable at a thermophilic temperature (55°C) with stable digester performance and methanogenic activity. A volatile solids (VS) destruction efficiency of 33 to 35% was achieved on waste-activated sludge, comparable to that obtained via mesophilic processes with low organic acid levels (<200 mg/liter chemical oxygen demand [COD]). Methane yield (VS basis) was 150 to 180 liters of CH4/kg of VSadded. According to 16S rRNA pyrotag sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the methanogenic community was dominated by members of the Methanosarcinaceae, which have a high level of metabolic capability, including acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Loss of function at an HRT of 2 days was accompanied by a loss of the methanogens, according to pyrotag sequencing. The two acetate conversion pathways, namely, acetoclastic methanogenesis and syntrophic acetate oxidation, were quantified by stable carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The results showed that the majority of methane was generated by nonacetoclastic pathways, both in the reactors and in off-line batch tests, confirming that syntrophic acetate oxidation is a key pathway at elevated temperatures. The proportion of methane due to acetate cleavage increased later in the batch, and it is likely that stable oxidation in the continuous reactor was maintained by application of the consistently low retention time.

[1]  R. Conrad.  Quantification of methanogenic pathways using stable carbon isotopic signatures: a review and a proposal , 2005 .

[2]  P. He,et al.  Methanosarcina as the dominant aceticlastic methanogens during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of putrescible waste , 2008, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[3]  S. Haruta,et al.  Methanogenic pathway and community structure in a thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of organic solid waste. , 2011, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[4]  D. Washington,et al.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater , 1971 .

[5]  Keisuke Hanaki,et al.  Treatise on water science , 2011 .

[6]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Identification of methanogenic pathways in anaerobic digesters using stable carbon isotopes , 2010 .

[7]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Acetate Oxidation Is the Dominant Methanogenic Pathway from Acetate in the Absence of Methanosaetaceae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  A. Schnürer,et al.  Syntrophaceticus schinkii gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a mesophilic anaerobic filter. , 2010, FEMS microbiology letters.

[9]  D. Valentine,et al.  Hydrogen production by methanogens under low-hydrogen conditions , 2000, Archives of Microbiology.

[10]  D. Batstone,et al.  Methanosarcina spp. Drive Vinyl Chloride Dechlorination via Interspecies Hydrogen Transfer , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  E. Pelletier,et al.  Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[12]  B. Svensson,et al.  Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors , 1999 .

[13]  B. Demirel,et al.  The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review , 2008 .

[14]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[15]  M. Switzenbaum,et al.  Relationship Between the Van Kleeck and Mass‐Balance Calculation of Volatile Solids Loss , 2003, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[16]  Damien J Batstone,et al.  Increased temperature in the thermophilic stage in temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) improves degradability of waste activated sludge. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Kelly P. Nevin,et al.  Interspecies Electron Transfer via Hydrogen and Formate Rather than Direct Electrical Connections in Cocultures of Pelobacter carbinolicus and Geobacter sulfurreducens , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Derek R. Lovley,et al.  Potential for Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Methanogenic Wastewater Digester Aggregates , 2011, mBio.

[19]  Michael J. Whiticar,et al.  Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation—Isotope evidence , 1986 .

[20]  H. Carrère,et al.  Thermal Methods to Enhance Biological Treatment Processes , 2012 .

[21]  Alfons J. M. Stams,et al.  Temperature susceptibility of thermophilic methanogenic sludge: Implications for reactor start-up and operation , 1993 .

[22]  A. Stams,et al.  Thermotoga lettingae sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, methanol-degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic anaerobic reactor. , 2002, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[23]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation. , 2009, Water research.

[24]  R. B. Newell,et al.  Modelling anaerobic degradation of complex wastewater. II: parameter estimation and validation using slaughterhouse effluent , 2000 .

[25]  David A. Stahl,et al.  Development and application of nucleic acid probes , 1991 .

[26]  Damien J Batstone,et al.  Temperature phased anaerobic digestion increases apparent hydrolysis rate for waste activated sludge. , 2011, Water research.

[27]  Birgitte Kiær Ahring,et al.  Acetate oxidation in a thermophilic anaerobic sewage-sludge digestor: the importance of non-aceticlastic methanogenesis from acetate , 1991 .

[28]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[29]  Marta Carballa,et al.  Relationship between microbial activity and microbial community structure in six full-scale anaerobic digesters. , 2012, Microbiological research.

[30]  Richard E Speece,et al.  Anaerobic biotechnology and odor/corrosion control for municipalities and industries , 2007 .

[31]  R. Conrad,et al.  Quantification of carbon flow from stable isotope fractionation in rice field soils with different organic matter content , 2007 .

[32]  D. Batstone,et al.  4.17 – Anaerobic Processes , 2011 .

[33]  Pinjing He,et al.  Predominant contribution of syntrophic acetate oxidation to thermophilic methane formation at high acetate concentrations. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[35]  H. Harmsen,et al.  Group-Specific 16S rRNA-Targeted Oligonucleotide Probes To Identify Thermophilic Bacteria in Marine Hydrothermal Vents , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[36]  H. Insam,et al.  Effect of Biowaste Sludge Maturation on the Diversity of Thermophilic Bacteria and Archaea in an Anaerobic Reactor , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  W. Gujer,et al.  Mathematical model for meso- and thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digestion. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  P. Parameswaran,et al.  Effects of solids retention time on methanogenesis in anaerobic digestion of thickened mixed sludge. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[39]  A. Guwy,et al.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  D. Maeder,et al.  The Methanosarcina barkeri Genome: Comparative Analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei Reveals Extensive Rearrangement within Methanosarcinal Genomes , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  Jung-Hui Woo,et al.  Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. , 2004, Water research.

[42]  D. Stahl,et al.  Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[43]  B K Ahring,et al.  Whole-cell hybridization of Methanosarcina cells with two new oligonucleotide probes , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[44]  Jing Liu,et al.  Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions , 2010 .

[45]  D J Batstone,et al.  Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anerobic digesters. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[46]  P. Claus,et al.  Temporal change of 13C-isotope signatures and methanogenic pathways in rice field soil incubated anoxically at different temperatures , 2004 .

[47]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[48]  S. Sørensen,et al.  454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. , 2013, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[49]  S. Zinder,et al.  Hydrogen Partial Pressures in a Thermophilic Acetate-Oxidizing Methanogenic Coculture , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[50]  S. Hattori.  Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbes in methanogenic environments. , 2008, Microbes and environments.

[51]  Paolo Pavan,et al.  Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process , 2005 .

[52]  J. K. Kim,et al.  Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. , 2006, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.