Positive feedback, stochasticity and genetic competence

A single gene, regulating its own expression via a positive feedback loop, constitutes a common motif in gene regulatory networks and signalling cascades. Recent experiments on the development of competence in the bacterial population B. subtilis show that the autoregulatory genetic module by itself can give rise to two types of cellular states. The states correspond to the low and high expression states of the master regulator ComK. The high expression state is attained when the ComK protein level exceeds a threshold value leading to a full activation of the autostimulatory loop. Stochasticity in gene expression drives the transitions between the two stable states. In this paper, we explain the appearance of bimodal protein distributions in B. subtilis cell population in the framework of three possible scenarios. In two of the cases, bistability provides the basis for binary gene expression. In the third case, the system is monostable in a deterministic description and stochasticity in gene expression is solely responsible for the appearance of the two expression states.

[1]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Guanghua Huang,et al.  Bistable expression of WOR1, a master regulator of white–opaque switching in Candida albicans , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Sierd Bron,et al.  Stripping Bacillus: ComK auto‐stimulation is responsible for the bistable response in competence development , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[5]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  J. Ferrell.  Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[8]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[9]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[10]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[11]  I. Bose,et al.  Graded and binary responses in stochastic gene expression , 2004, Physical biology.

[12]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[14]  S. Strogatz.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering , 1995 .

[15]  M. Ko,et al.  A stochastic model for gene induction. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[17]  Matthieu Louis,et al.  Binary and Graded Responses in Gene Networks , 2002, Science's STKE.

[18]  Oscar P. Kuipers,et al.  Phenotypic variation in bacteria: the role of feedback regulation , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[19]  Ping Ao,et al.  Noise in a small genetic circuit that undergoes bifurcation , 2005, Complex..

[20]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[21]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[22]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Jason R. Pirone,et al.  Fluctuations in transcription factor binding can explain the graded and binary responses observed in inducible gene expression. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[26]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Bistability in the Bacillus subtilis K‐state (competence) system requires a positive feedback loop , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[28]  R. Losick,et al.  Bistability in bacteria , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  R. Zordan,et al.  Epigenetic properties of white–opaque switching in Candida albicans are based on a self-sustaining transcriptional feedback loop , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[31]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. Arkin,et al.  From Fluctuations to Phenotypes: The Physiology of Noise , 2006, Science's STKE.