Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Designing Work Within and Between Organizations

The design of work has been and will continue to be a central problem challenging organization theory and practice. The system of arrangements and procedures for doing work affects all workers every day throughout the world. Work is changing dramatically. In an increasingly global and knowledge-intensive economy, work design is no longer contained within an organization; it often transcends the boundaries of organizations and countries. These changes call for a renewed research focus on work design. Building on configuration and complexity perspectives, we propose a framework for studying work design. We argue that three issues require attention to advance the knowledge of work design: (1) defining the boundaries of work systems, (2) examining how the system is nested in a hierarchy within and between organizations, and (3) determining interactions between the elements of a work system. We propose a method of frontier analysis for identifying equifinal designs-the set of equally effective work designs for different combinations of inputs (situations or contexts) and outputs (performance criteria). When work designs are examined longitudinally, these methods permit an examination of adaptation processes on changing fitness landscapes, suggesting how work systems may increase, decrease, or sustain their relative performance over time.

[1]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[2]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  Organizational Configurations And Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[5]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[6]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[7]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating the information content of a measure of plant output: An application to high-technology manufacturing , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[9]  Jon Arsen Chilingerian Investigating Non-Medical Factors Associated with the Technical Efficiency of Physicians in the Provisions of Hospital Services: A Pilot Study. , 1989 .

[10]  Stacey L. Schreft,et al.  A closer look at jobless recoveries , 2003 .

[11]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  Organization and management in the embrace of government , 2002 .

[12]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Social networks and organizations , 2003 .

[14]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[15]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[16]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[17]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[18]  E. Leach The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries , 2003 .

[19]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[21]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[22]  A. Athos,et al.  The Art of Japanese Management , 1982 .

[23]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[24]  J. Child Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice , 1977 .

[25]  Kenneth D. Mackenzie,et al.  Processes and Their Frameworks , 2000 .

[26]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[27]  S. Levitan,et al.  The economics of collective action , 1951 .

[28]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence , 2003, CSUR.

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[30]  K. Arrow Information and Economic Behavior , 1973 .

[31]  Joan Magretta,et al.  The Power of Virtual Integration: An Interview with Dell Computer''s Michael Dell , 1998 .

[32]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Variety in the Execution of Organizational Work Processes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[33]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Outsourcing innovation the new engine of growth , 2000 .

[34]  Matt Barney Motorola's Second Generation , 2002 .

[35]  David Miller,et al.  Some Organizational Consequences of Ceo Succession , 1993 .

[36]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational consultant: creating a usable theory for organizational design , 1996 .

[37]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation , 2001 .

[38]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Work-Unit Task Uncertainty, Design and Morale , 1989 .

[39]  Reviewed by Jonathan Levie Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation and Entrepreneurship in High Technology , 2003 .

[40]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[42]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[43]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[44]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[45]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  Innovation Explosion : Using Intellect and Software to Revolutionize Growth Strategies , 1997 .

[46]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era , 2001 .

[47]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[48]  M. Porter What is strategy , 2000 .

[49]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[50]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Misperceiving Interactions Among Complements and Substitutes: Organizational Consequences , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[51]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry , 1992 .

[52]  William H. Dutton,et al.  IT and the Changing Social Division of Labor: the Case of Electronics Contract Manufacturing , 2004 .

[53]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[54]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Sequential Variety in Work Processes , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[55]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[56]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[57]  John Child,et al.  Organization: Contemporary Principles and Practice , 2005 .

[58]  K. K. Sinha,et al.  Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R & D environments , 2002 .

[59]  P. Khandwalla Effect of Competition on the Structure of Top Management Control , 1973 .

[60]  M. Baba,et al.  The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team , 2004 .

[61]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Understanding Variation in Chronic Disease Outcomes , 2002, Health care management science.

[62]  O. Williamson Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory , 1993 .

[63]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[64]  David A. Nadler,et al.  The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century , 1999 .

[65]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Nonprofit Organizations in an Age of Uncertainty: A Study of Organizational Change , 1998 .

[66]  M. Dell The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Interview by Joan Magretta. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[67]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[68]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Went for Cost, Stayed for Quality?: Moving the Back Office to India , 2003 .

[69]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification , 2004 .

[70]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[71]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  At Home in the Universe , 1995 .

[72]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  FROM BUYER TO INTEGRATOR: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SUPPLY‐CHAIN MANAGER IN THE VERTICALLY DISINTEGRATING FIRM , 2002 .

[73]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[74]  H A Juris,et al.  The economics of collective action. , 1976, A report of the ... National Forum on Hospital and Health Affairs. National Forum on Hospital and Health Affairs.

[75]  Richard E. Kopelman,et al.  Trust and the Health of Organizations , 2004 .

[76]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[77]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Red Queen in organizational creation and development , 2002 .

[78]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[79]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[80]  Kingshuk K. Sinha,et al.  Moving frontier analysis , 1996 .

[81]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[82]  Simon M. Potter,et al.  FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK Current Issues IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE www.newyorkfed.org/rmaghome/curr_iss Has Structural Change Contributed to a Jobless Recovery? , 2003 .

[83]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[84]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[86]  R. Gulati,et al.  Adaptation in Vertical Relationships: Beyond Incentive Conflict , 2005 .

[87]  J. Child MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE‐PART II. A CONTINGENCY ANALYSIS , 1975 .

[88]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[89]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Trust as an Organizing Principle Bill McEvily , 2003 .

[90]  Cynthia Rodriguez Cano Trust and the Health of Organizations , 2002 .

[91]  L KraemerKenneth,et al.  Information technology and economic performance , 2003 .

[92]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study , 1999 .

[93]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[94]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[95]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[96]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[97]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[98]  K. Dooley,et al.  Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics , 1999 .

[99]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research , 2000 .

[100]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[101]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[102]  D. Rousseau Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[103]  B. McKelvey Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science , 1997 .

[104]  Jan W. Rivkin Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[105]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[106]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[107]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Relying on Trust in Cooperative Inter-Organizational Relationships , 2006 .

[108]  C. B. Schoonhoven Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[109]  J. Pennings The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness. , 1975 .

[110]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[111]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.