Major Complications of Regional Anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service

Background Several previous surveys have estimated the rate of major complications that occur after regional anesthesia. However, because of the increase in the use of regional anesthesia in recent years and because of the introduction of new techniques, reappraisal of the incidence and the characteristics of major complications is useful. Methods All French anesthesiologists were invited to participate in this 10-month prospective survey based on (1) voluntary reporting of major complications related to regional anesthesia occurring during the study period using a telephone hotline service available 24 h a day and managed by three experts, and (2) voluntary reporting of the number and type of regional anesthesia procedures performed using pocket booklets. The service was free of charge for participants. Results The participants (n = 487) reported 56 major complications in 158,083 regional anesthesia procedures performed (3.5/10,000). Four deaths were reported. Cardiac arrest occurred after spinal anesthesia (n = 10; 2.7/10,000) and posterior lumbar plexus block (n = 1; 80/10,000). Systemic local anesthetic toxicity consisted of seizures only, without cardiac toxicity. Lidocaine spinal anesthesia was associated with more neurologic complications than bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (14.4/10,000 vs. 2.2/10,000). Most neurologic complications were transient. Among 12 that occurred after peripheral nerve blocks, 9 occurred in patients in whom a nerve stimulator had been used. Conclusion This prospective survey based on a free hotline permanent telephone service allowed us to estimate the incidence of major complications related to regional anesthesia and to provide a detailed analysis of these complications.

[1]  M. Tunstall,et al.  Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study. , 1995, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[2]  Lawrence Litt,et al.  Serious Complications Related to Regional Anesthesia: Results of a Prospective Survey in France , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[3]  B M Hibbard,et al.  Serious non-fatal complications associated with extradural block in obstetric practice. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  David H. W. Wong,et al.  Lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with subcutaneous infiltration for analgesia following foot surgery , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[5]  M. Raucoules-Aimé,et al.  An Evaluation of the Brachial Plexus Block at the Humeral Canal Using a Neurostimulator (1417 Patients): The Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Criteria of Failure , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  P. Drolet,et al.  Anatomy of the posterior approach to the lumbar plexus block , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  C. Aveline,et al.  Rachianesthésie totale après bloc du plexus lombaire par voie postérieure , 1998 .

[8]  A. Bollen,et al.  Persistent Sacral Sensory Deficit Induced by Intrathecal Local Anesthetic Infusion in the Rat , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[9]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Regional Anesthesia and Local Anesthetic-Induced Systemic Toxicity: Seizure Frequency and Accompanying Cardiovascular Changes , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  Y. Auroy,et al.  French survey of anesthesia in 1996. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[11]  J. Gerancher.  Cauda equina syndrome following a single spinal administration of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre needle. , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[12]  P. Drolet,et al.  Posterior approach to the lumbar plexus combined with a sciatic nerve block using lidocaine , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[13]  M. Lahdensuu,et al.  Severe complications associated with epidural and spinal anaesthesias in Finland 1987–1993 A study based on patient insurance claims , 1997, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[14]  O. C. Phillips,et al.  Neurologic complications following spinal anesthesia with lidocaine: a prospective review of 10,440 cases. , 1969, Anesthesiology.

[15]  Anthony Rodgers,et al.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  W. Urmey,et al.  Interscalene Block: The Truth About Twitches , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[17]  H. Wakeling,et al.  Undiagnosed raised intracranial pressure complicating labour. , 1995, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[18]  P. Gleyze,et al.  Bloc interscalénique et chirurgie de l'épaule. Etude prospective d'une série continue de 167 patients , 1997 .

[19]  D. Benhamou,et al.  Comparison Between Conventional Axillary Block and a New Approach at the Midhumeral Level , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  R. Dripps,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics: failure to discover major neurological sequelae. , 1954, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[21]  D. Moore,et al.  Spinal (subarachnoid) block. A review of 11,574 cases. , 1966, JAMA.

[22]  F. X. Riegler.  Brachial Plexus Block with the Nerve Stimulator:: Motor Response Characteristics at Three Sites , 1992, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[23]  B. Calon,et al.  Block of the brachial plexus branches by the humeral route. A prospective study in 503 ambulatory patients. Proposal of a nerve‐blocking sequence , 1999, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[24]  N. Dahlgren,et al.  Neurological complications after anaesthesia. A follow‐up of 18 000 spinal and epidural anaesthetics performed over three years , 1995, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[25]  D. Lambert,et al.  Cauda equina syndrome and continuous spinal anesthesia. , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  C. Franco,et al.  1,001 Subclavian Perivascular Brachial Plexus Blocks: Success With a Nerve Stimulator , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.