Manipulating grooming by decreasing ectoparasite load causes unpredicted changes in antagonism

It is thought that allogrooming is practised strategically in order to establish, maintain and reinforce social bonds between group members, exchanging one altruistic behaviour for a different form of reciprocated benefit at a later date. Correlational evidence supports this, but evidence of causality is lacking. We reduced parasite loads in eight meerkat Suricata suricatta groups, generating a substantial decrease in grooming. Contrary to the predictions, overall antagonism did not increase. However, within group networks, grooming increased towards individuals who increased their antagonism. This was restricted to antagonism focused on social position, rather than access to physical resources. The treatment also increased an alternative placatory behaviour: unprompted submissions. Following treatment, individuals performed higher rates of guarding and marking behaviours, suggesting that they were stressed. A reduction in opportunity to mediate stress through grooming may explain local rises in antagonism and corresponding increases in placatory behaviours. We suggest that meerkats use allogrooming (and submissions) as a facultative response to antagonism, rather than a pre-emptive strategy to avert it by establishing a network of associations, as has been suggested for primates.

[1]  A. Radford,et al.  Dual function of allopreening in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe, Phoeniculus purpureus , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees , 1989 .

[3]  Nigel C. Bennett,et al.  Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates , 2006, Nature.

[5]  M. Manser,et al.  Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  G. Schino,et al.  Grooming and aggression in captive Japanese macaques , 2005, Primates.

[7]  K. Zamma Grooming site preferences determined by lice infection among Japanese macaques in Arashiyama , 2007, Primates.

[8]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Hormonal correlates of dominance in meerkats (Suricata suricatta) , 2004, Hormones and Behavior.

[9]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Do meerkats engage in conflict management following aggression? Reconciliation, submission and avoidance , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  M. D. Bitetti Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Gerald S. Wilkinson,et al.  Social grooming in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys , 1984, Nature.

[13]  Eric B. Keverne,et al.  Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships , 1989, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[14]  Gabriele Schino,et al.  Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  J. Silk Altruism Among Female Macaca Radiata: Explanations and Analysis of Patterns of Grooming and Coalition Formation , 1982 .

[16]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Techniques for Analyzing Vertebrate Social Structure Using Identified Individuals: Review and Recommendations , 1999 .

[18]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[19]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Gabriele Schino,et al.  Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism , 2007 .

[21]  Susan Perry,et al.  Female‐female social relationships in wild white‐faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus , 1995 .

[22]  A Griffin,et al.  Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. , 2001, Science.

[23]  Lynette A. Hart,et al.  Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  M. Sánchez-Villagra,et al.  Relation of Intergroup Variation in Allogrooming to Group Social Structure and Ectoparasite Loads in Red Howlers (Alouatta seniculus) , 1998, International Journal of Primatology.

[25]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Aggression and submission reflect reproductive conflict between females in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  D. Cheney The acquisition of rank and the development of reciprocal alliances among free-ranging immature baboons , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  J. Veà,et al.  Allogrooming behavior inCercocebus torquatus: The case for the hygienic functional hypothesis , 2000, Primates.

[28]  Di bitetti MS Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate , 1997, Animal behaviour.

[29]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta) , 2003 .

[30]  J. Krause,et al.  Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  F B de Waal,et al.  Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[32]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats , 2006, Animal Behaviour.