Radiation Dose from Whole-Body F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Nationwide Survey in Korea

The purpose of this study was to estimate average radiation exposure from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examinations and to analyze possible factors affecting the radiation dose. A nation-wide questionnaire survey was conducted involving all institutions that operate PET/CT scanners in Korea. From the response, radiation doses from injected FDG and CT examination were calculated. A total of 105 PET/CT scanners in 73 institutions were included in the analysis (response rate of 62.4%). The average FDG injected activity was 310 ± 77 MBq and 5.11 ± 1.19 MBq/kg. The average effective dose from FDG was estimated to be 5.89 ± 1.46 mSv. The average CT dose index and dose-length product were 4.60 ± 2.47 mGy and 429.2 ± 227.6 mGy∙cm, which corresponded to 6.26 ± 3.06 mSv. The radiation doses from FDG and CT were significantly lower in case of newer scanners than older ones (P < 0.001). Advanced PET technologies such as time-of-flight acquisition and point-spread function recovery were also related to low radiation dose (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the average radiation dose from FDG PET/CT is estimated to be 12.2 mSv. The radiation dose from FDG PET/CT is reduced with more recent scanners equipped with image-enhancing algorithms.

[1]  S. Vogiatzi,et al.  Collective effective dose in Europe from X-ray and nuclear medicine procedures. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  S. Vogiatzi,et al.  Analysis of factors correlating with medical radiological examination frequencies. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  E. Petrova,et al.  Patient doses from PET-CT procedures. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  H Bergmann,et al.  Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines , 2014, Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  P. Roch,et al.  National survey of patient doses from whole-body FDG PET-CT examinations in France in 2011. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  Koichiro Abe,et al.  Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures , 2012, Ca.

[10]  D. Lee,et al.  The Current Status and Future Perspectives of Nuclear Medicine in Korea , 2010, Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[11]  R. Bly,et al.  Recently revised diagnostic reference levels in nuclear medicine in Bulgaria and in Finland. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  R. Smart,et al.  Diagnostic Reference Activities for Nuclear Medicine Procedures in Australia and New Zealand Derived from the 2008 Survey , 2009 .

[13]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Icrp.  Main Text , 2008, Annals of the ICRP.

[17]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[18]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: (Addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53) ICRP Publication 80 Approved by the Commission in September 1997 , 1998, Annals of the ICRP.

[19]  D. Mieth,et al.  Ethical Aspects of Cloning Techniques , 1997, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[20]  伊沢 正実,et al.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1961 .

[21]  G. Stamm,et al.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[22]  International Commission on Radiological Protection, Committee I. The evaluation of risks from radiation. , 1966, Health physics.