Development of dual-curing type experimental composite resin cement for orthodontic bonding -effect of additional amount of accelerators on the mechanical properties-.

In this study, a dual-curing type composite resin cement that included a photo-initiator and two accelerators was designed. In particular, special emphasis was made on addressing questions on the effects from different amounts of additional accelerators on the flexural strength of the designed experimental composite resin cement, as well as on the tensile bond strength of the bracket bonded onto the enamel surface by the experimental composite resin cement. When 0.25 mass% of the p-tolydiethanolamine and sodium p-toluenesulfinate were added, the maximum flexural strength was obtained for the chemical-cured and dual-cured experimental composite resin cement. The dual-cured experimental composite resin cement's flexural strength value was in the mid-range of the values exhibited from the commercial resin cements. However, the dual-cured experimental composite resin cement exhibited noticeably high tensile bond strength when compared with the results obtained with the commercial resin cements.

[1]  T. Hayakawa,et al.  Efficacy of using orthodontic adhesive resin in bonding and debonding characteristics of a calcium phosphate ceramic bracket , 2006 .

[2]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  Orthodontic bracket bonding: enamel bond strength vs time. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  C. Tani,et al.  Efficacy of experimental dual-cure resin cement for orthodontic direct bond system , 2006 .

[4]  T. G. Bradley,et al.  A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  T. Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  A. Jacobson,et al.  An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  H. Matsumura,et al.  Effect of acidic primers on bonding between stainless steel and auto-polymerizing methacrylic resins. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  M. Nishiyama,et al.  Synthesis of fluoride releasing phosphazene monomers and their application to dental resin , 1997 .

[9]  T. Eliades,et al.  Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  J. Fricker.  A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  S. Hondrum,et al.  Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  P. Shivapuja,et al.  The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  R. Greenlaw,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of a visible light-cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding systems. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  J. Powers,et al.  In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[15]  E. Mizrahi.  Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: a review of clinical failure rate. , 1983, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  T. Tanaka,et al.  4-META Opaque Resin — A New Resin Strongly Adhesive to Nickel-Chromium Alloy , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[18]  G. Bogdon.  Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets (I). , 1978, Quintessence international, dental digest.

[19]  M. Buonocore.  A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.