A comparison of preservice and in-service earth and space science teachers' general mental abilities, content knowledge, and problem-solving skills

The purpose of this study was to compare in-service and preservice earth and space science teachers on their general mental abilities, their content knowledge or declarative knowledge of earth and space sciences, the Gagnean levels of their content knowledge or declarative knowledge, and the procedural knowledge used in solving earth and space science problems. This study used a contrast-group design to compare in-service (n = 30) and preservice (n = 30) earth and space science teachers. The in-service earth science teachers (a) bring more declarative knowledge to the problem-solving situation, (b) use fewer steps while problem solving, (c) generate more subroutines and alternate hypotheses, and (d) possess different structural knowledge than do preservice earth science teachers. Findings from this study support Norman's theory of learning that experts (in-service teachers) function at the tuning mode of learning, whereas novices (preservice teachers) function in an accreting or structuring mode. In-service earth science teachers exhibited smoothness, automaticity, and decreased mental effort not exhibited by preservice earth and space science teachers.

[1]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  The relationship among logical thinking, problem sloving instruction, and knowledge and application of earth science subject matter , 1982 .

[2]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .

[3]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[4]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[5]  Paul Horst,et al.  A generalized expression for the reliability of measures , 1949, Psychometrika.

[6]  Robert L. Heller The earth science curriculum project , 1963 .

[7]  Ron Good,et al.  Problem solving and chemical equilibrium: Successful versus unsuccessful performance , 1989 .

[8]  Ron Good,et al.  Problem solving and classical genetics: Successful versus unsuccessful performance† , 1984 .

[9]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  The effects of a problem solving strategy on the achievement of earth science students , 1981 .

[10]  L. Shulman,et al.  Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning , 1978 .

[11]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[12]  Joan I. Heller,et al.  Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics , 1982 .

[13]  Mitchell Rabinowitz,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Process in Highly Competent Performance. , 1985 .

[14]  Haim Levy,et al.  Statistics: Decisions and Applications in Business and Economics , 1981 .

[15]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognition of learning physics , 1981 .

[16]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Analyzing difficulties with mole-concept tasks by using familiar analog tasks , 1984 .

[17]  W. Wollman,et al.  Models and procedures: Teaching for transfer of pendulum knowledge , 1984 .

[18]  B Walton,et al.  Job and Task Analysis. , 1979 .

[19]  D. Norman Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[20]  John R. Staver,et al.  The Influence of Cognitive Reasoning Level, Cognitive Restructuring Ability, Disembedding Ability, Working Memory Capacity, and Prior Knowledge On Students' Performance On Balancing Equations by Inspection. , 1988 .

[21]  Mark W. Hackling,et al.  Expert and novice solutions of genetic pedigree problems , 1988 .

[22]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Victor L. Willson,et al.  Theory‐building and theory‐confirming observation in science and science education , 1987 .

[24]  Mike U. Smith Successful and unsuccessful problem solving in classical genetic pedigrees , 1988 .

[25]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[27]  Paul F. Merrill,et al.  Hierarchical & information processing task analysis: A comparison , 1978 .

[28]  R. Glaser Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .