HCI International 2019 - Posters

E-government holds tremendous potential for improving the authoritative effectiveness of public institutions, empowering democratic governance, and building trust between citizens/private sector and governments. One of the module in e-government that are expanding gain consideration is eparticipation. However, most e-government activities to date have neglected to achieve their maximum capacity, since they are progressively tormented by usability issues. Therefore, there have been expanding calls for assessing the usability of e-government sites, as they are broadly viewed as the essential stage for government communication with citizens. This empirical study, therefore seeks to extant knowledge by assessing the usability of Malaysia e-government site concentrating on the e-participation. This is especially vital as little is known about the usability of e-participation and four ministries websites were selected for such evaluation. A total of 10 participants volunteered in this study that employed System Usability Scale method. Analysis of the SUS demonstrated that the usability of the chosen site was marginal with all the average usability score was below 70%.

[1]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[2]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ , 1991, SGCH.

[3]  S. Embretson,et al.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 1999, Stroke.

[4]  M. Levin,et al.  Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients , 2001, Stroke.

[5]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Timo Ojala,et al.  MobiLenin combining a multi-track music video, personal mobile phones and a public display into multi-user interactive entertainment , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.

[9]  K. Webster,et al.  Validity of the GAITRite walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[10]  J. Eng,et al.  A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  G. Fulk,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Gait Speed in Individuals Undergoing Rehabilitation After Stroke , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[13]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) May Modify the Poor Prognosis of Stroke Survivors with Severe Motor Loss of the Upper Extremity: A Preliminary Study , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[14]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Gary Marsden,et al.  SnapAndGrab: accessing and sharing contextual multi-media content using bluetooth enabled camera phones and large situated displays , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Hui Chen,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Flashlight interaction: a study on mobile phone interaction techniques with large displays , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[18]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Digifieds: insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild , 2011, MUM.

[19]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Designing Shared Public Display Networks - Implications from Today's Paper-Based Notice Areas , 2011, Pervasive.

[20]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Open Display Networks: A Communications Medium for the 21st Century , 2012, Computer.

[21]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Interaction techniques for creating and exchanging content with public displays , 2013, CHI.

[22]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Comfortable Speed as a Measure of Gait Performance in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Rehabilitation after Stroke , 2013, Journal of physical therapy science.

[23]  Moira C. Norrie,et al.  PresiShare: opportunistic sharing and presentation of content using public displays and QR codes , 2013, PerDis '13.

[24]  L. Richards,et al.  Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  S. Page,et al.  Psychometrics of the Wrist Stability and Hand Mobility Subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Moderately Impaired Stroke , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[26]  J. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Applications of Brain–Machine Interface Systems in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation , 2014, Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.

[27]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  How Do Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scores Relate to Dexterity According to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 Months Poststroke? , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke , 2015, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[29]  Rui José,et al.  Web-based applications for open display networks: developers' perspective , 2015, Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng..

[30]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[31]  Sasu Tarkoma,et al.  Personal Device as a Controller for Interactive Surfaces: Usability and Utility of Different Connection Methods , 2015, ITS.

[32]  Florian Alt,et al.  What People Really Remember: Understanding Cognitive Effects When Interacting with Large Displays , 2015, ITS.

[33]  R. Calabró,et al.  The role of virtual reality in improving motor performance as revealed by EEG: a randomized clinical trial , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[34]  Jeremy C. Rietschel,et al.  Determining Levels of Upper Extremity Movement Impairment by Applying a Cluster Analysis to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  Winyu Chinthammit,et al.  Enhanced engagement with public displays through mobile phone interaction , 2017, SIGGRAPH ASIA Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications.

[36]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  EEG-Based Strategies to Detect Motor Imagery for Control and Rehabilitation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[37]  Sarah Clinch,et al.  SlideTalk: Encouraging User Engagement with Slideshow Displays , 2018, PerDis.