Top-down activation of fusiform cortex without seeing faces in prosopagnosia.

Face processing can be modified by bottom-up and top-down influences, but it is unknown how these processes interact in patients with face-recognition impairments (prosopagnosia). We investigated a prosopagnosic with lesions in right occipital and left fusiform cortex but whose right fusiform gyrus is intact and still activated during face-processing tasks. P.S., a patient with a well-established and selective agnosia for faces, was instructed to detect the presence of either faces or houses in pictures with different amounts of noise. The right fusiform face area (FFA) showed reduced responses to face information when visual images were degraded with noise. However, her right FFA still activated to noise-only images when she was instructed to detect faces. These results reveal that fusiform activation is still selectively modulated by task demands related to the anticipation of a face, despite severe face-recognition deficits and the fact that no reliable stimulus-driven response is evoked by actual facial information. Healthy controls showed stimulus-driven responses to faces in fusiform, and in right but not left occipital cortex, suggesting that the latter area alone might provide insufficient facial information in P.S. These results provide a novel account for residual activation of the FFA and underscore the importance of controlling task demands during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

[1]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[2]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Visual Agnosias and Other Disturbances of Visual Perception and Cognition , 1991 .

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Recognition impairments and face imagery , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[5]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Peelen,et al.  Emotional attention in acquired prosopagnosia. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[8]  John T. Clark,et al.  Contextually Evoked Object-Specific Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2004 .

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  A. Cavanna,et al.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[14]  Jie Tian,et al.  BRAIN IMAGING NEUROREPORT , 2007 .

[15]  S Zeki,et al.  The sightless view: neural correlates of occluded objects. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  J. C. Meadows The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  E. Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[18]  J Sergent,et al.  Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[21]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  anonymous,et al.  Visual agnosia , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[24]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.

[25]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[27]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Vecera,et al.  What Processing Is Impaired in Apperceptive Agnosia? Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Benton,et al.  Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. , 1972, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[30]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[33]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Reorganization of Visual Processing in Macular Degeneration , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[36]  Aina Puce,et al.  The functional magnetic resonance imaging hemodynamic response to faces remains stable until the ninth decade , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Reference Frames for Spatial Cognition: Different Brain Areas are Involved in Viewer-, Object-, and Landmark-Centered Judgments About Object Location , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[39]  T. Busey,et al.  Seeing faces in the noise: Stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  T Yamamoto,et al.  Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The roles of “face” and “non-face” areas during individual face perception: Evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient , 2008, NeuroImage.

[42]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Cholinergic enhancement modulates neural correlates of selective attention and emotional processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[45]  R. Goebel,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj005 Impaired Face Discrimination in Acquired Prosopagnosia Is Associated with Abnormal Response to Individual Faces in the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus , 2005 .

[46]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images , 2000, NeuroImage.

[47]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  B. Wandell,et al.  V1 projection zone signals in human macular degeneration depend on task, not stimulus. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[51]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[53]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  Apperceptive agnosia due to carbon monoxide poisoning. An interpretation based on critical band masking from disseminated lesions , 2000 .

[55]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[56]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Are Unilateral Right Posterior Cerebral Lesions Sufficient to Cause Prosopagnosia? Clinical and Radiological Findings in Six Additional Patients , 1986, Cortex.

[59]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  M. Goodale Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1995 .

[61]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[62]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[63]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A critique of functional localisers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[64]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .

[65]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[66]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Beatrice de Gelder,et al.  Neural Correlates of Perceiving Emotional Faces and Bodies in Developmental Prosopagnosia: An Event-Related fMRI-Study , 2008, PloS one.

[69]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Face imagery and its relation to perception and covert recognition in prosopagnosia , 2003, Neurology.

[70]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[72]  Richard A. Abrams,et al.  Random visual noise impairs object-based attention , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[74]  L. Cohen,et al.  The neural bases of prosopagnosia and pure alexia: recent insights from functional neuroimaging , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[75]  P. Matthews,et al.  Effective Paradigm Design , 2001 .

[76]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[77]  P. C. Murphy,et al.  Cerebral Cortex , 2017, Cerebral Cortex.

[78]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[80]  D. Amaral,et al.  Amygdalo‐cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis) , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[81]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Non-linear Registration , 2007 .