Toward the Formulation of a Realistic Fault Governing Law in Dynamic Models of Earthquake Ruptures

Dynamic earthquake models can help us in the ambitious understanding, from a deterministic point of view, of how a rupture starts to develop and propagates on a fault, how the excited seismic waves travel in the Earth crust and how the high frequency radiation can damage a site on the ground. Since analytical solutions of the fully dynamic, spontaneous rupture problem do not exist (even in homogeneous conditions), realistic and accurate numerical experiments are the only available tool in studying earthquake sources basing on Newtonian Mechanics. Moreover, they are a credible way of generating physics– based ground motions. In turn, this requires the introduction of a fault governing law, which prevents the solutions to be singular and the crack tip and the energy flux to be unbounded near the rupture front. Contrary to other ambits of Physics, Seismology presently lacks knowledge of the exact physical law which governs natural faults and this is one of the grand challenges for modern seismologists. While for elastic solids it exists an equation of motion which relates particle motion to stresses and forces through the material properties (the scale–free Navier–Cauchy’s equation), for a region undergoing inelastic, brittle deformations this equation is presently missed and scientists have yet to fully decipher the fundamental mechanisms of friction. The traction evolution occurring during an earthquake rupture depends on several mechanisms, potentially concurrent and competing one with each other. Recent laboratory data and field observations revealed the presence, and sometime the coexistence, of thermally–activated processes (such as thermal pressurization of pore fluids, flash heating of asperity contacts, thermally–induced chemical reactions, melting of rocks and gouge debris), porosity and permeability evolution, elasto–dynamic lubrication, etc. In this chapter we will analyze, in an unifying and comprehensive sketch, all possible chemico–physical mechanisms that can affect the fault weakening and we will explicitly indicate how they can be incorporated in a realistic governing model. We will also show through numerical simulations that simplified constitutive models that neglect these phenomena appear to be inadequate to describe the details of the stress release and the consequent high frequency seismic wave radiation. In fact, quantitative estimates show that in most cases the incorporation of such nonlinear phenomena has significant effects, often dramatic, on the dynamic rupture propagation, that finally lead to different damages on the free surface.

[1]  D. Goldsby,et al.  Flash Melting of Crustal Rocks at Almost Seismic Slip Rates , 2003 .

[2]  J. Rice,et al.  Dilatancy, compaction, and slip instability of a fluid‐infiltrated fault , 1995 .

[3]  J. Weertman,et al.  Unstable slippage across a fault that separates elastic media of different elastic constants , 1980 .

[4]  Toshihiko Shimamoto,et al.  High‐velocity frictional properties of gabbro , 1997 .

[5]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Effects of a low-velocity zone on a dynamic rupture , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Mitiyasu Ohnaka,et al.  A constitutive scaling law and a unified comprehension for frictional slip failure, shear fracture of intact rock, and earthquake rupture , 2003 .

[7]  W. Brace,et al.  Stick-Slip as a Mechanism for Earthquakes , 1966, Science.

[8]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  The wrinkle‐like slip pulse is not important in earthquake dynamics , 2005 .

[9]  Jonathan M. Lees,et al.  Tomographic P‐wave velocity images of the Loma Prieta Earthquake asperity , 1990 .

[10]  J. Spray Pseudotachylyte controversy: Fact or friction? , 1995 .

[11]  M. Cocco,et al.  A thermal pressurization model for the spontaneous dynamic rupture propagation on a three‐dimensional fault: 2. Traction evolution and dynamic parameters , 2006 .

[12]  R. Sibson Brecciation processes in fault zones: Inferences from earthquake rupturing , 1986 .

[13]  T. Yamashita Generation of microcracks by dynamic shear rupture and its effects on rupture growth and elastic wave radiation , 2000 .

[14]  Y. Fialko,et al.  Fusion by earthquake fault friction: Stick or slip? , 2005 .

[15]  Paul Spudich,et al.  Effects of supershear rupture speed on the high-frequency content of S waves investigated using spontaneous dynamic rupture models and isochrone theory , 2008 .

[16]  A. Sommerfeld Mechanics of Deformable Bodies , 1950 .

[17]  P. Moczo,et al.  The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation , 2007 .

[18]  K. Aki,et al.  Seismic Trapped Modes in the Oroville and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1990, Science.

[19]  M. Renardy Ill-posedness at the boundary for elastic solids sliding under Coulomb friction , 1992 .

[20]  R. Sibson Thickness of the Seismic Slip Zone , 2003 .

[21]  N. Sleep,et al.  Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults , 1992, Nature.

[22]  F. Chester,et al.  Microfracture analysis of fault growth and wear processes, Punchbowl Fault, San Andreas system, California , 2003 .

[23]  J. T. Engelder,et al.  Cataclasis and the Generation of Fault Gouge , 1974 .

[24]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Solving the dynamic rupture problem with different numerical approaches and constitutive laws , 2001 .

[25]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of faults , 2001 .

[26]  Friction of rocks , 1978 .

[27]  Eric M. Dunham,et al.  Earthquake slip between dissimilar poroelastic materials , 2008 .

[28]  D. Andrews A fault constitutive relation accounting for thermal pressurization of pore fluid , 2002 .

[29]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[30]  Yehuda Ben-Zion Comment on ''Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direction'' by R. A. Harris and S. M. Day , 2006 .

[31]  H. Jeffreys On the Mechanics of Faulting , 1942, Geological Magazine.

[32]  J. Vidale,et al.  Low-velocity fault-zone guided waves: Numerical investigations of trapping efficiency , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[33]  N. Sleep Application of a unified rate and state friction theory to the mechanics of fault zones with strain localization , 1997 .

[34]  N. Hovius,et al.  Tectonic Faults: Agents of Change on a Dynamic Earth , 2007 .

[35]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Evidence for fault lubrication during the 1999 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan, earthquake (Mw7.6) , 2003 .

[36]  M. Cocco,et al.  Comment on “Earthquake cycles and physical modeling of the process leading up to a large earthquake” , 2006 .

[37]  Jin-Han Ree,et al.  Ultralow Friction of Carbonate Faults Caused by Thermal Decomposition , 2007, Science.

[38]  Massimo Cocco,et al.  3D dynamic simulations of spontaneous rupture propagation governed by different constitutive laws with rake rotation allowed , 2005 .

[39]  J R Booker,et al.  Aftershocks Caused by Pore Fluid Flow? , 1972, Science.

[40]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direction , 2005 .

[41]  D. McKenzie,et al.  The Generation and Compaction of Partially Molten Rock , 1984 .

[42]  Terry E. Tullis,et al.  The roles of time and displacement in the evolution effect in rock friction , 1994 .

[43]  James R. Rice,et al.  Seismic Fault Rheology and Earthquake Dynamics , 2006 .

[44]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening , 2005 .

[45]  Elisa Tinti,et al.  Modeling the dynamic rupture propagation on heterogeneous faults with rate- and state-dependent friction , 2005 .

[46]  M. Cocco,et al.  A thermal pressurization model for the spontaneous dynamic rupture propagation on a three‐dimensional fault: 1. Methodological approach , 2006 .

[47]  Andrea Antonioli,et al.  Evidence of instantaneous dynamic triggering during the seismic sequence of year 2000 in south Iceland , 2006 .

[48]  A. Taflove The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[49]  M. F. Linker,et al.  Effects of variable normal stress on rock friction: Observations and constitutive equations , 1992 .

[50]  A. Michael,et al.  Relations Among Fault Behavior, Subsurface Geology, and Three-Dimensional Velocity Models , 1991, Science.

[51]  B. Atkinson Fracture Mechanics of Rock , 1987 .

[52]  Jean-Pierre Petit,et al.  Can natural faults propagate under Mode II conditions , 1988 .

[53]  M. Takeo,et al.  Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis , 1997 .

[54]  F. Chester,et al.  Ultracataclasite structure and friction processes of the Punchbowl Fault , 1998 .

[55]  M. Ohnaka Earthquake cycles and physical modeling of the process leading up to a large earthquake , 2004 .

[56]  A. Ruina Slip instability and state variable friction laws , 1983 .

[57]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Frictional melt and seismic slip , 2008 .

[58]  N. Sleep Ductile creep, compaction, and rate and state dependent friction within major fault zones , 1995 .

[59]  T. Hirose,et al.  Extreme dynamic weakening of faults during dehydration by coseismic shear heating , 2007 .

[60]  J. Rice Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip , 2006 .

[61]  P. Spudich,et al.  On the Mechanical Work Absorbed on Faults During Earthquake Ruptures , 2006 .

[62]  M. Belardinelli,et al.  Modelling instantaneous dynamic triggering in a 3‐D fault system: application to the 2000 June South Iceland seismic sequence , 2008 .

[63]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Reconstruction of seismic faulting by high‐velocity friction experiments: An example of the 1995 Kobe earthquake , 2007 .

[64]  A. Pitarka,et al.  The SCEC/USGS Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Code Verification Exercise , 2012 .

[65]  M. Cocco,et al.  On the slip‐weakening behavior of rate‐ and state dependent constitutive laws , 2002 .

[66]  A. Bizzarri Can flash heating of asperity contacts prevent melting? , 2009 .