The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities

Abstract.  In this paper, we examine efforts undertaken by two cities – Atlanta and LaGrange, Georgia – to redress the digital divide. Atlanta's initiative has taken the form of community technology centres where citizens can come to get exposure to the internet, and learn something about computers and their applications. LaGrange has taken a very different approach, providing free internet access to the home via a digital cable set‐top box. Using theoretical constructs from Bourdieu, we analysed how the target populations and service providers reacted to the two initiatives, how these reactions served to reproduce the digital divide, and the lessons for future digital divide initiatives. In our findings and analysis, we see a reinforcement of the status quo. When people embrace these initiatives, they are full of enthusiasm, and there is no question that some learning occurs and that the programmes are beneficial. However, there is no mechanism for people to go to the next step, whether that is technical certification, going to college, buying a personal computer or escaping the poverty that put them on the losing end of the divide in the first place. This leads us to conclude that the Atlanta and LaGrange programmes could be classified as successes in the sense that they provided access and basic computer literacy to people lacking these resources. However, both programmes were, at least initially, conceived rather narrowly and represent short‐term, technology‐centric fixes to a problem that is deeply rooted in long‐standing and systemic patterns of spatial, political and economic disadvantage. A persistent divide exists even when cities are giving away theoretically ‘free’ goods and services.

[1]  Gary Chapman,et al.  Nurturing neighborhood nets , 1997 .

[2]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  The Digital Divide and Information Systems Research: Stepping Up or Stepping Away? , 2004 .

[3]  安藤 聡,et al.  The Inheritors , 2000, The Inheritors and The Nature of a Crime.

[4]  Jack Linchuan Qiu,et al.  Internet Connectedness and Inequality , 2001, Commun. Res..

[5]  Amanda Lenhart Who’s Not Online , 2000 .

[6]  James R. Valadez Searching for a Path out of Poverty: Exploring the Achievement Ideology of a Rural Community College , 2000 .

[7]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide , 2002 .

[8]  J. Macleod,et al.  Ain't no makin' it : aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood , 1996 .

[9]  J. Mcconnaughey Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide , 1998 .

[10]  Milton L. Mueller,et al.  Universal Service from the Bottom Up: A Study of Telephone Penetration in Camden, New Jersey , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Mark Blaug,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life , 1976 .

[12]  Henry A. Giroux Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition , 1983 .

[13]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[14]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[15]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The information age: Economy, society and culture. , 1998 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  bell hooks,et al.  Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center , 1984 .

[18]  M. Alvesson Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[19]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age , 1998 .

[20]  A. Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[21]  James E. Katz,et al.  Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: results of a national public opinion survey , 1997, Internet Res..

[22]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  C. Avgerou Recognising Alternative Rationalities in the Deployment of Information Systems , 2000, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[24]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[25]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[26]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet , 1998, Science.

[27]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[28]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Must Try Harder! Problems Facing Technological Solutions to Non‐participation in Adult Learning , 2000 .

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[30]  D. Eagle,et al.  Community informatics : shaping computer-mediated social relations , 2001 .

[31]  Stephanie Lawler,et al.  ‘Getting Out and Getting Away’: Women's Narratives of Class Mobility , 1999 .

[32]  B. Compaine The Digital Divide : Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? , 2001 .

[33]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS , 1994, MIS Q..

[34]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[35]  M. Keil,et al.  Free Internet Initiative in LaGrange, Georgia , 2002 .

[36]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Defining Away the Digital Divide: A Content Analysis of Institutional Influences on Popular Representations of Technology , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[37]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[38]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[39]  P. Willis Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs , 1976 .

[40]  Kathy Schwalbe,et al.  Information Technology Project Management , 1999 .

[41]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears , 1996 .

[42]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[43]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[44]  H. Bernard Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .

[45]  Scott C. Forbes,et al.  Identifying Temporary and Permanent Gaps in Universal Service , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[46]  P. Norris,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement , 2001 .

[47]  Margaret Honey,et al.  Effective Technology Use in Low-Income Communities: Research Review for the America Connects Consortium. CCT Reports. , 2001 .

[48]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[49]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[50]  M. Agar Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[51]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[52]  K. Hacker,et al.  Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[53]  R. Morrow,et al.  Social Theory and Education: A Critique of Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction , 1995 .

[54]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[55]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[56]  Teresa E. Anderson,et al.  Assessing telecommunications technology as a tool for urban community building , 1995 .

[57]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[58]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Defining the ‘Digital Divide’: Developing a Theoretical Understanding of Inequalities in the Information Age , 2002 .

[59]  D. Holt Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption , 1998 .

[60]  Lynette Kvasny Problematizing the digital divide : cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative , 2002 .

[61]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Reproduction in education, society and culture , 1970 .