Survival differences following lung transplantation among US transplant centers.

CONTEXT Although case loads vary substantially among US lung transplant centers, the impact of center effects on patient outcomes following lung transplantation is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess variability in long-term survival following lung transplantation among US lung transplant centers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Analysis of data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for 15,642 adult patients undergoing lung transplantation between 1987 and 2009 in 61 US transplantation centers still active in 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mixed-effect Cox models were fitted to assess survival following lung transplantation at individual centers. RESULTS In 2008, 19 centers (31.1%) performed between 1 and 10 lung transplantations; 18 centers (29.5%), from 11 to 25 transplantations; 20 centers (32.8%), from 26 to 50 transplantations; and 4 centers (6.6%), more than 50 transplantations. One-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates among all 61 centers were 93.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.0% to 93.8%), 79.7% (95% CI, 79.1% to 80.4%), 63.0% (95% CI, 62.2% to 63.8%), and 49.5% (95% CI, 48.6% to 50.5%), respectively. Characteristics of donors, recipients, and surgical techniques varied substantially among centers. After adjustment for these factors, marked variability remained among centers, with hazard ratios for death ranging from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82) to 1.71 (95% CI, 1.36 to 2.14) for low- vs high-risk centers, for 5-year survival rates of 30.0% to 61.1%. Higher lung transplantation volumes were associated with improved long-term survival and accounted for 15% of among-center variability; however, variability in center performance remained significant after controlling for procedural volume (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Center-specific variation in survival following lung transplantation was only partly associated with procedural volume. However, other statistically significant sources of variability remain to be identified.

[1]  A. Rahmel,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirteenth official pediatric heart transplantation report--2010. , 2010, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[2]  E. Livingston,et al.  Procedure volume as a predictor of surgical outcomes. , 2010, JAMA.

[3]  Y. Castier,et al.  Survival After Bilateral Versus Single-Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  A. Rahmel,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-sixth Official Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation Report-2009. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[5]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  The impact of center volume on survival in lung transplantation: an analysis of more than 10,000 cases. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  L. Sharples,et al.  Disease‐Specific Survival Benefit of Lung Transplantation in Adults: A National Cohort Study , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[7]  Juha Karvanen,et al.  Visualizing covariates in proportional hazards model , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  R. Porcher,et al.  Determinants of the survival benefit of lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[10]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Survival after bilateral versus single lung transplantation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective analysis of registry data , 2008, The Lancet.

[11]  Aaron B Caughey,et al.  Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Katherine S Panageas,et al.  Properties of analysis methods that account for clustering in volume–outcome studies when the primary predictor is cluster size , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  G. Lang,et al.  Institutional experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[14]  S. Keshavjee,et al.  The effect of recipient's age on lung transplant outcome. , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[15]  C. Begg,et al.  The Effect of Clustering of Outcomes on the Association of Procedure Volume and Surgical Outcomes , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Rainer Muche,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data.DW Hosmer, Jr., S Lemeshow. New York: John Wiley, 1999, pp.386, US$89.95. ISBN: 0-471-15410-5. , 2001 .

[19]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[20]  J. Roberts,et al.  The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  T M Therneau,et al.  Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models. , 1995, Biometrics.

[22]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[23]  Ø. Borgan,et al.  Lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a national cohort is without obvious survival benefit. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[24]  Tom Hughes-Davies,et al.  Hospital volume and outcomes of mechanical ventilation. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  M. Tomita,et al.  [Lung transplantation]. , 1991, Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology.

[26]  S Greenland,et al.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.