Bias corrections of GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 with TCCON data and their evaluation using aircraft measurement data

Abstract. We describe a method for removing systematic biases of column-averaged dry air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) and CH4 (XCH4) derived from short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) spectra of the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). We conduct correlation analyses between the GOSAT biases and simultaneously retrieved auxiliary parameters. We use these correlations to bias correct the GOSAT data, removing these spurious correlations. Data from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) were used as reference values for this regression analysis. To evaluate the effectiveness of this correction method, the uncorrected/corrected GOSAT data were compared to independent XCO2 and XCH4 data derived from aircraft measurements taken for the Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner (CONTRAIL) project, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the US Department of Energy (DOE), the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole observations (HIPPO) program, and the GOSAT validation aircraft observation campaign over Japan. These comparisons demonstrate that the empirically derived bias correction improves the agreement between GOSAT XCO2/XCH4 and the aircraft data. Finally, we present spatial distributions and temporal variations of the derived GOSAT biases.

[1]  John Robinson,et al.  Drivers of column-average CO 2 variability at Southern Hemispheric total carbon column observing network sites , 2013 .

[2]  Makoto Saito,et al.  Regional CO2 flux estimates for 2009–2010 based on GOSAT and ground-based CO2 observations , 2012 .

[3]  Pauli Heikkinen,et al.  Inferring regional sources and sinks of atmospheric CO 2 from GOSAT XCO 2 data , 2013 .

[4]  Hiroshi Watanabe,et al.  Effects of atmospheric light scattering on spectroscopic observations of greenhouse gases from space. Part 2: Algorithm intercomparison in the GOSAT data processing for CO2 retrievals over TCCON sites , 2013 .

[5]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Improvement of the retrieval algorithm for GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 and their validation using TCCON data , 2013 .

[6]  Yukio Yoshida,et al.  Validation of TANSO-FTS/GOSAT XCO2 and XCH4 glint mode retrievals using TCCON data from near-ocean sites , 2015 .

[7]  O. Schneising,et al.  SCIAMACHY WFM-DOAS X CO 2 : reduction of scattering related errors , 2012 .

[8]  Eric A. Kort,et al.  Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north , 2012 .

[9]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  H. Inoue,et al.  Variations in atmospheric CO2 at the Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan , 1996 .

[11]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space , 2011 .

[12]  A. Poberovskii,et al.  Comparisons of CH4 ground-based FTIR measurements near Saint Petersburg with GOSAT observations , 2014 .

[13]  Geoffrey C. Toon,et al.  Appendices to: Emissions of greenhouse gases from a North American megacity , 2009 .

[14]  Toshinobu Machida,et al.  Worldwide Measurements of Atmospheric CO2 and Other Trace Gas Species Using Commercial Airlines , 2008 .

[15]  T. Machida,et al.  Aircraft measurements of the concentrations of CO2, CH4, N2O, and CO and the carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios of CO2 in the troposphere over Russia , 1997 .

[16]  Y. Niwa,et al.  Evaluation of a new JMA aircraft flask sampling system and laboratory trace gas analysis system , 2013 .

[17]  J. Landgraf,et al.  Validation of SCIAMACHY HDO/H2O measurements using the TCCON and NDACC-MUSICA networks , 2014 .

[18]  Maximilian Reuter,et al.  Anthropogenic carbon dioxide source areas observed from space: assessment of regional enhancements and trends , 2012 .

[19]  Henry Buijs,et al.  Update on GOSAT TANSO-FTS performance, operations, and data products after more than 6 years in space , 2016 .

[20]  Tapio Schneider,et al.  Sources of variations in total column carbon dioxide , 2010 .

[21]  J. Comstock,et al.  The DOE ARM Aerial Facility , 2014 .

[22]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Atmospheric carbon dioxide retrieved from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT): Comparison with ground‐based TCCON observations and GEOS‐Chem model calculations , 2012 .

[23]  S. Houweling,et al.  Reduced carbon uptake during the 2010 Northern Hemisphere summer from GOSAT , 2013 .

[24]  David D. Nelson,et al.  Evaluation of the airborne quantum cascade laser spectrometer (QCLS) measurements of the carbon and greenhouse gas suite – CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO – during the CalNex and HIPPO campaigns , 2013 .

[25]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Preliminary validation of column-averaged volume mixing ratios of carbon dioxide and methane retrieved from GOSAT short-wavelength infrared spectra , 2010 .

[26]  Shuji Kawakami,et al.  Aircraft measurements of carbon dioxide and methane for the calibration of ground-based high-resolution Fourier Transform Spectrometers and a comparison to GOSAT data measured over Tsukuba and Moshiri , 2012 .

[27]  Makoto Saito,et al.  On the Benefit of GOSAT Observations to the Estimation of Regional CO2 Fluxes , 2011 .

[28]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  The ACOS CO 2 retrieval algorithm – Part II: Global X CO 2 data characterization , 2012 .

[29]  James B. Abshire,et al.  Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data , 2010 .

[30]  Masakatsu Nakajima,et al.  Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. , 2009, Applied optics.

[31]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Seasonal climatology of CO2 across North America from aircraft measurements in the NOAA/ESRL Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network , 2015 .

[32]  Technical Note: Latitude-time variations of atmospheric column-average dry air mole fractions of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O , 2012 .

[33]  Atsushi Takizawa,et al.  Large XCH4 anomaly in summer 2013 over northeast Asia observed by GOSAT , 2015, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[34]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  A multi-year record of airborne CO 2 observations in the US Southern Great Plains , 2012 .

[35]  C. Sweeney,et al.  Atmospheric column-averaged mole fractions of carbon dioxide at 53 aircraft measurement sites , 2012 .

[36]  Justus Notholt,et al.  Simulations of column-averaged CO 2 and CH 4 using the NIES TM with a hybrid sigma-isentropic (σ-θ) vertical coordinate , 2012 .

[37]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Impact of aerosol and thin cirrus on retrieving and validating XCO2 from GOSAT shortwave infrared measurements , 2013 .

[38]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Influence of aerosols and thin cirrus clouds on the GOSAT-observed CO 2 : a case study over Tsukuba , 2011 .

[39]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Does GOSAT capture the true seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[40]  Christopher D. Barnet,et al.  Characterization and validation of methane products from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) , 2008 .

[41]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Atmospheric greenhouse gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY: comparison to ground-based FTS measurements and model results , 2011 .

[42]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Comparisons between XCH4 from GOSAT Shortwave and Thermal Infrared Spectra and Aircraft CH4 Measurements over Guam , 2012 .

[43]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results , 2009 .

[44]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Retrieval algorithm for CO 2 and CH 4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse gases observing satellite , 2010 .

[45]  P. M. Lang,et al.  CO 2 , CO, and CH 4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts , 2014 .

[46]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Comparisons between SCIAMACHY and ground-based FTIR data for total columns of CO, CH 4 , CO 2 and N 2 O , 2005 .

[47]  D. Wunch,et al.  Total column CO 2 measurements at Darwin, Australia – site description and calibration against in situ aircraft profiles , 2010 .

[48]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Validation of XCH 4 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data , 2014 .

[49]  S. Wofsy,et al.  HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained, global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[50]  H. Matsueda,et al.  Measurements of atmospheric CO2 from a meteorological tower in Tsukuba, Japan , 2001 .

[51]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  The ACOS CO 2 retrieval algorithm – Part 1: Description and validation against synthetic observations , 2011 .

[52]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  The greenhouse gas climate change initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparative validation of GHG-CCI SCIAMACHY/ENVISAT and TANSO-FTS/GOSAT CO2 and CH4 retrieval algorithm products with measurements from the TCCON , 2013 .

[53]  Justus Notholt,et al.  Side by side measurements of CO2 by ground-based Fourier transform spectrometry (FTS) , 2010 .

[54]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Validation of XCO 2 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data , 2011 .