Local vs. Avatar Robot: Performance and Perceived Workload of Service Encounters in Public Space

In recent years, the demand for remote services has increased with concerns regarding the spread of infectious diseases and employees’ quality of life. Many attempts have been made to enable store staff to provide various services remotely via avatars displayed to on-site customers. However, the workload required on the part of service staff by the emerging new work style of operating avatar robots remains a concern. No study has compared the performance and perceived workload of the same staff working locally versus remotely via an avatar. In this study, we conducted an experiment to identify differences between the performance of in-person services and remote work through an avatar robot in an actual public space. The results showed that there were significant differences in the partial performance between working via an avatar and working locally, and we could not find significant difference in the overall performance. On the other hand, the perceived workload was significantly lower when the avatar robot was used. We also found that customers reacted differently to the robots and to the in-person participants. In addition, the workload perceived by operators in the robotic task was correlated with their personality and experience. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first investigation of both performance and workload in remote customer service through robotic avatars, and it has important implications for the implementation of avatar robots in service settings.

[1]  T. Golden,et al.  Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success , 2020 .

[2]  Lorenzo Sabattini,et al.  Relieving operators’ workload: Towards affective robotics in industrial scenarios , 2018, Mechatronics.

[3]  Xun Wang,et al.  Would you like to sample? Robot engagement in a shopping centre , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Teleoperation of Multiple Social Robots , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[5]  Michael T. Sliter,et al.  The differential effects of interpersonal conflict from customers and coworkers: trait anger as a moderator. , 2011, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Preliminary Field Trial for Teleoperated Communication Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[7]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  James E. Young,et al.  Social Robotics for Nonsocial Teleoperation: Leveraging Social Techniques to Impact Teleoperator Performance and Experience , 2020 .

[9]  Osman M. Karatepe,et al.  The impacts of core self-evaluations on customer-related social stressors and emotional exhaustion , 2010 .

[10]  Marketta Niemelä,et al.  Should a Robot Guide Like a Human? A Qualitative Four-Phase Study of a Shopping Mall Robot , 2019, ICSR.

[11]  Nicholas Bloom,et al.  Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment , 2013 .

[12]  Naoki Mizukami,et al.  Japanese version of NASA Task Load Index , 1996 .

[13]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Never too old for teleoperation: Helping elderly people control a conversational service robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[14]  Yuichiro Yoshikawa,et al.  Teleoperated Robot Acting Autonomous for Better Customer Satisfaction , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Yuichiro Yoshikawa,et al.  Teleoperated Robot Sells Toothbrush in a Shopping Mall: A Field Study , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  E. Hill,et al.  Influences of The Virtual Office on Aspects of Work and Work/Life Balance , 1998 .

[17]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  An Autonomous Dynamic Camera Method for Effective Remote Teleoperation , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Investigation of Multiple Resource Theory Design Principles on Robot Teleoperation and Workload Management , 2021, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[19]  Yuichiro Yoshikawa,et al.  Behavioral assessment of a humanoid robot when attracting pedestrians in a mall , 2021, ArXiv.

[20]  Kazuaki Tanaka,et al.  Comparing Video, Avatar, and Robot Mediated Communication: Pros and Cons of Embodiment , 2014, CollabTech.

[21]  R. Pereira,et al.  Decision Factors for Remote Work Adoption: Advantages, Disadvantages, Driving Forces and Challenges , 2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[22]  Rae Yule Kim The Impact of COVID-19 on Consumers: Preparing for Digital Sales , 2020, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[23]  Diane E. Bailey,et al.  The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime , 1999 .

[24]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A Communication Robot in a Shopping Mall , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[25]  Timothy D. Golden,et al.  Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions , 2006 .

[26]  Nicholas J. Ashill,et al.  The impact of call centre stressors on inbound and outbound call‐centre agent burnout , 2013 .

[27]  Pino Cutrone,et al.  日本語版Ten Item Personality Inventory(TIPI-J)作成の試み , 2012 .

[28]  Iddo Gal,et al.  Stressors and resources in customer service roles , 2008 .

[29]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..