Do You Know What I Know? A Shared Understandings Perspective on Text-Based Communication

This article illustrates how the hermeneutic analysis of text illuminates how shared understandings affect our interpretations of lean communication in distributed work environments. It is proposed that in contrast to the pessimistic conclusions of media richness theory that lean communication channels cannot support complex or equivocal work tasks, miscommunications are not the result of technology, but rather occur due to a lack of shared understandings among the individuals communicating. An illustrative case study based on fieldwork in franchise organizations is presented to demonstrate the possibilities for how the hermeneutic analysis of coherence, invention, intention, and reference can be used to discover how workers create and recreate shared understandings through text.

[1]  Michelle M. Kazmer,et al.  Do You Read Me? Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Chat Communities , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Karianne Skovholt,et al.  Email Copies in Workplace Interaction , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[4]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[6]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Discursive articulations of presence in virtual organizing , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[7]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Enhancing Mutual Understanding in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication by Training , 2003, Commun. Res..

[8]  Robert Buday.  Un consultor rinde cuentas , 2003 .

[9]  R. Hess.  Power in organizations. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[10]  R. Feinberg,et al.  The state of electronic customer relationship management in retailing , 2002 .

[11]  Cathy Owens Swift,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Learning: Discussion Boards and Chat Rooms as Project Communication Tools , 2002 .

[12]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[13]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. , 2002 .

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Managing Distance over Time: The Evolution of Technologies of Dis/Ambiguation , 2002 .

[16]  R. Boland.  Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process , 2002 .

[17]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[18]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Teaming together apart: emergent patterns of media use in collaboration at a distance , 2000, 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation. ipcc sigdoc 2000. Technology and Teamwork. Proceedings. IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference an.

[19]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[20]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[21]  J. Burn,et al.  Communicating for advantage in the virtual organization , 1999 .

[22]  F. Wilson.  Cultural Control within the Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[23]  H. Reis,et al.  Social Cognition in Relationships: Building Essential Bridges Between Two Literatures , 1999 .

[24]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[25]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[27]  Y. P. Shao,et al.  A model of virtual organisations , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Keri E. Pearlson,et al.  Two Cheers for the Virtual Office , 1998 .

[29]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[30]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model , 1997, CACM.

[31]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[32]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 1996 .

[33]  A. Becker,et al.  Beyond Translation: Essays toward a Modern Philology , 1995 .

[34]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[35]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[36]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[37]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[38]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[39]  K. Blamey,et al.  From Text to Action Essays in Hermeneutics Ii , 1991 .

[40]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[41]  D. Reisman.  Theories of Collective Action: Downs, Olson, and Hirsch , 1990 .

[42]  D. Reisman.  Theories of collective action , 1990 .

[43]  Lisa Ede,et al.  Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing , 1990 .

[44]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[45]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Power in and Around Organizations , 1983 .

[46]  C. Geertz.  Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology , 1983 .

[47]  A. Becker,et al.  The Imagination of Reality: Essays in Southeast Asian Coherence Systems , 1981, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[48]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[49]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .