Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae

Cooperation is central to many major transitions in evolution, including the emergence of eukaryotic cells, multicellularity and eusociality. Cooperation can be destroyed by the spread of cheater mutants that do not cooperate but gain the benefits of cooperation from others. However, cooperation can be preserved if cheaters are facultative, cheating others but cooperating among themselves. Several cheater mutants have been studied before, but no study has attempted a genome-scale investigation of the genetic opportunities for cheating. Here we describe such a screen in a social amoeba and show that cheating is multifaceted by revealing cheater mutations in well over 100 genes of diverse types. Many of these mutants cheat facultatively, producing more than their fair share of spores in chimaeras, but cooperating normally when clonal. These findings indicate that phenotypically stable cooperative systems may nevertheless harbour genetic conflicts. The opportunities for evolutionary moves and countermoves in such conflicts may select for the involvement of multiple pathways and numerous genes.

[1]  David L. Steffen,et al.  The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2005, Nature.

[2]  D. Greig,et al.  The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  M. Travisano,et al.  Strategies of microbial cheater control. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[4]  C. Shaw,et al.  A novel developmental mechanism in Dictyostelium revealed in a screen for communication mutants. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[5]  Tissue-specific G1-phase cell-cycle arrest prior to terminal differentiation in Dictyostelium , 2004, Development.

[6]  R. Lenski,et al.  Loss of social behaviors by myxococcus xanthus during evolution in an unstructured habitat. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Filosa.  Heterocytosis in Cellular Slime Molds , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. Sussman,et al.  Cultivation and synchronous morphogenesis of Dictyostelium under controlled experimental conditions. , 1987, Methods in cell biology.

[9]  A. Kuspa,et al.  Tagging developmental genes in Dictyostelium by restriction enzyme-mediated integration of plasmid DNA. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  K. Foster,et al.  Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Christa Lanz,et al.  Comprehensive mutation identification in an evolved bacterial cooperator and its cheating ancestor. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Single-Gene Greenbeard Effects in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Science.

[14]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[15]  H. Lodish,et al.  Developmental regulation of Dictyostelium discoideum actin gene fusions carried on low-copy and high-copy transformation vectors , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  G. J. Velicer,et al.  Exploitative and Hierarchical Antagonism in a Cooperative Bacterium , 2005, PLoS biology.

[17]  R. Nielsen.  Molecular signatures of natural selection. , 2005, Annual review of genetics.

[18]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  A bZIP/bRLZ transcription factor required for DIF signaling in Dictyostelium , 2004, Development.

[19]  R. Kessin.  Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[20]  W F Loomis,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA replication but no nuclear DNA replication during development of Dictyostelium. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Developmental signal transduction pathways uncovered by genetic suppressors. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria , 2004, Nature.

[23]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[24]  C N David,et al.  Fate and regulation of anterior-like cells in Dictyostelium slugs. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[25]  R. Kessin,et al.  Dictyostelium amoebae lacking an F-box protein form spores rather than stalk in chimeras with wild type. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Lenski,et al.  Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus , 2000, Nature.

[27]  J. Williams,et al.  A new anatomy of the prestalk zone in Dictyostelium , 1989, Nature.

[28]  L W Buss,et al.  Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.