An interfacing strategy for fluid-structure interaction with application to linear hydroelasticity

To improve the accuracy of the numerical procedure in hydroelastic analysis, two areas are studied in this work.. One is the interface methods used to couple the fluid and the structural meshes. The other is the hydrostatic stiffness for use in hydroelastic analysis of flexible floating structures. Nonlinear, time-domain hydroelastic analysis offlexible offshore structures requires that the structural motion be transferred to the fluid model and the resulting fluid pressure at the fluid-structure interface be transferred from the fluid model to the structure. When the structural mesh and the fluid mesh describe two distinct three-dimensional surfaces, the transfer ofthe displacement and pressure is both difficult and non-unique. A new transfer methodology based on the variational-based smoothing element analysis (SEA) technique is presented. The displacement transfer uses the original formulation of the SEA, although the application of the procedure to displacement transfer is new. For energy conservation during the reverse pressure transfer, SEA is modified. The transfer method is tested by examining the performance of three floating rigid bodies. Application of the methodology to flexible bodies is also presented. The numerical results show that the method works very well. The formulation of the hydrostatic stiffness for linear rigid body hydrodynamics is well-known. An explicit formulation for an analogous hydrostatic stiffness in linear hydroelasticity, which is applicable to both rigid body and flexible displacement, is not well-known. Three such formulations have been proposed previously in the literature, none of which is quite correct. An explicit formulation for the complete hydrostatic stiff-

[1]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Aeroelastic Dynamic Analysis of a Full F-16 Configuration for Various Flight Conditions , 2003 .

[2]  H. Ronald Riggs,et al.  An improved variational method for finite element stress recovery and a posteriori error estimation , 1998 .

[3]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[4]  Lafayette K. Taylor,et al.  Computation of steady and unsteady flows with a free surface around the Wigley hull , 1998 .

[5]  K. Appa,et al.  The determination of load and slope transformation matrices for aeroelastic analysis , 1985 .

[6]  H. R. Riggs,et al.  Stress recovery and error estimation for shell structures , 2000 .

[7]  J. A. Salvato John wiley & sons. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  Structural and aerodynamic data transformation using inverse isoparametric mapping , 1992 .

[9]  Odd M. Faltinsen MOTIONS OF LARGE STRUCTURES IN WAVES AT ZERO FROUDE NUMBER , 1974 .

[10]  Guru P. Guruswamy,et al.  Wing-body aeroelasticity on parallel computers , 1996 .

[11]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[12]  H. D. Hibbit Some follower forces and load stiffness , 1979 .

[13]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Time‐decomposed parallel time‐integrators: theory and feasibility studies for fluid, structure, and fluid–structure applications , 2003 .

[14]  L. E. Malvern Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[15]  Xiao-Qun Luo,et al.  Finite element method for developing arbitrary surfaces to flattened forms , 2003 .

[16]  H. R. Riggs,et al.  A variational method for finite element stress recovery and error estimation , 1994 .

[17]  J. N. Newman WAVE EFFECTS ON DEFORMABLE BODIES , 1994 .

[18]  Kari Appa,et al.  Finite-surface spline , 1989 .

[19]  I. Jadic,et al.  Interfacing of Fluid and Structural Models via Innovative Structural Boundary Element Method , 1998 .