Gross Tumor Delineation in Esophageal Cancer on MRI Compared With F-FDG-PET/CT

Purpose: Current delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in esophageal cancer relies on computed tomography (CT) and combination with F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). There is increasing interest in integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation treatment, which can potentially obviate CTor FDG-PET/CTebased delineation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of target delineation on T2-weighted (T2W) MRI and T2W including diffusion-weighted MRI (T2W þ DW-MRI) compared with current-practice FDG-PET/CT. Methods: Ten observers delineated primary esophageal tumor GTVs of 6 patients on FDG-PET/ CT, T2W-MRI, and T2W þ DW-MRI. GTVs, generalized conformity indices, in-slice delineation variation (root mean square), and standard deviations in the position of the most cranial and caudal delineated slice were calculated. Results: Delineations on MRI showed smaller GTVs compared with FDG-PET/CTebased delineations. The main variation was seen at the cranial and caudal border. No differences were Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. * Corresponding author. Departments of Surgery and Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail address: j.nijkamp@nki.nl (J. Nijkamp). 1 Co-first authors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.004 2452-1094/ 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Advances in Radiation Oncology (2019) 4, 596-604 www.advancesradonc.org observed in conformity indices (FDG-PET/CT, 0.68; T2W-MRI, 0.66; T2W þ DW-MRI, 0.68) and in-slice variation (root mean square, 0.13 cm on FDG-PET/CT; 0.10 cm on T2W-MRI; 0.14 cm on T2W þ DW-MRI). In the 2 tumors involving the gastroesophageal junction, addition of DW-MRI to T2W-MRI significantly decreased caudal border variation. Conclusions: MRI-based target delineation of the esophageal tumor is feasible with interobserver variability comparable to that with FDG-PET/CT, despite limited experience with delineation on MRI. Most variation was seen at cranial-caudal borders, and addition of DW-MRI to T2W-MRI may reduce caudal delineation variation of gastroesophageal junction tumors. 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

[1]  S. Heijmink,et al.  Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study , 2018, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[2]  Steven H. Lin,et al.  Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. , 2018, Annals of translational medicine.

[3]  M. V. Boxtel,et al.  Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy , 2017, Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology.

[4]  Zhifei Wen,et al.  The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Local Control and Toxicity of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Interim Results from a Prospective Phase I/II Trial , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[6]  Toru Ogura,et al.  18F-FDG uptake in the stomach on screening PET/CT: value for predicting Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic atrophic gastritis , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[7]  C. Fuller,et al.  The MRI-Linear Accelerator Consortium: Evidence-Based Clinical Introduction of an Innovation in Radiation Oncology Connecting Researchers, Methodology, Data Collection, Quality Assurance, and Technical Development , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[8]  C. Terhaard,et al.  Validated guidelines for tumor delineation on magnetic resonance imaging for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer , 2016, Acta oncologica.

[9]  K. Haustermans,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[10]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  L. Stalpers,et al.  Craniocaudal tumour extension in uterine cervical cancer on MRI compared to histopathology , 2015, European journal of radiology open.

[12]  Daniel T Chang,et al.  Expert Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Eisaku Ito,et al.  Ultra-high-resolution MR imaging of esophageal carcinoma at ultra-high field strength (7.0T) ex vivo: correlation with histopathologic findings. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[15]  R. Wahl,et al.  Liver Standardized Uptake Value Corrected for Lean Body Mass at FDG PET/CT: Effect of FDG Uptake Time , 2015, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[16]  A. Svindland,et al.  Detection of the index tumour and tumour volume in prostate cancer using T2‐weighted and diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone , 2014, BJU international.

[17]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Prostate tumour volumes: evaluation of the agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and histology using novel co‐registration software , 2014, BJU international.

[18]  E. J. van der Jagt,et al.  Clinical validation of FDG-PET/CT in the radiation treatment planning for patients with oesophageal cancer. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  C. Ménard,et al.  Introduction: Systems for magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[20]  M. Moerland,et al.  Quantification of esophageal tumor motion on cine-magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Improved longitudinal length accuracy of gross tumor volume delineation with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[22]  G. Meijer,et al.  Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what’s the role of MRI? , 2013, European Radiology.

[23]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Eugene H. Blackstone,et al.  7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Consequences of additional use of PET information for target volume delineation and radiotherapy dose distribution for esophageal cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  E. Kouwenhoven,et al.  Measuring the similarity of target volume delineations independent of the number of observers , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[30]  K. Brock,et al.  Improving observer variability in target delineation for gastro-oesophageal cancer--the role of (18F)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[31]  D. Collins,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  T. Conroy,et al.  Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  A. Riddell,et al.  The development and optimization of high spatial resolution MRI for imaging the oesophagus using an external surface coil. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[34]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. , 1989, Radiology.

[36]  K. Haustermans,et al.  Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[37]  Jasper Nijkamp,et al.  Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[38]  A. Riddell,et al.  High-resolution MRI in evaluation of the surgical anatomy of the esophagus and posterior mediastinum. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  K. Horton,et al.  Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.