Searching for massive clusters in weak lensing surveys

We explore the ability of weak lensing surveys to locate massive clusters. We use both analytic models of dark matter haloes and mock weak lensing surveys generated from a large cosmological N-body simulation. The analytic models describe the average properties of weak lensing haloes and predict the number counts, enabling us to compute an effective survey selection function. We argue that the detectability of massive haloes depends not only on the halo mass but also strongly on the redshift where the halo is located. We test the model prediction for the peak number counts in weak lensing mass maps against mock numerical data, and find that the noise resulting from intrinsic galaxy ellipticities causes a systematic effect which increases the peak counts. We develop a correction scheme for the systematic effect in an empirical manner, and show that, after correction, the model prediction agrees well with the mock data. The mock data is also used to examine the completeness and efficiency of the weak lensing halo search by fully taking into account the noise and the projection effect by large-scale structures. We show that the detection threshold of S/N = 4 ∼ 5 gives an optimal balance between completeness and efficiency. Our results suggest that, for a weak lensing survey with a galaxy number density of n g = 30 arcmin -2 with a mean redshift of z = 1, the mean number of haloes which are expected to cause lensing signals above S/N = 4 is N balo (S/N > 4) = 37 per 10 deg 2 , whereas 23 of the haloes are actually detected with S/N > 4, giving the effective completeness as good as 63 per cent. Alternatively, the mean number of peaks in the same area is N peak = 62 for a detection threshold of S/N = 4. Among the 62 peaks, 23 are caused by haloes with the expected peak height S/N >4, 13 result from haloes with 3 < S/N < 4 and the remaining 26 peaks are either the false peaks caused by the noise or haloes with a lower expected peak height. Therefore the contamination rate is 44 per cent (this could be an overestimation). Weak lensing surveys thus provide a reasonably efficient way to search for massive clusters.

[1]  C. Alcock Gravitational lenses , 1982, Nature.

[2]  B. Jain,et al.  The three‐point correlation function in cosmology , 2002, astro-ph/0209167.

[3]  Naoki Yoshida,et al.  Reliability of the Dark Matter Clustering in Cosmological N-Body Simulations on Scales below the Mean Separation Length of Particles , 2001 .

[4]  Candace Oaxaca WrightTereasa G. Brainerd,et al.  Gravitational Lensing by NFW Halos , 1999, astro-ph/9908213.

[5]  SEARCHING FOR DARK MATTER HALOS IN THE SUPRIME-CAM 2 SQUARE DEGREE FIELD , 2002, astro-ph/0210441.

[6]  Non-Gaussian cosmic microwave background temperature fluctuations from peculiar velocities of clusters , 2001, astro-ph/0104332.

[7]  Weak-lensing halo numbers and dark-matter profiles , 2001, astro-ph/0103465.

[8]  M. Bartelmann,et al.  Weak gravitational lensing , 2016, Scholarpedia.

[9]  Mining weak lensing surveys , 2002, astro-ph/0210478.

[10]  M. White,et al.  Completeness in Weak-Lensing Searches for Clusters , 2001, astro-ph/0111490.

[11]  Y. Mellier Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing , 1998, astro-ph/9812172.

[12]  J. Patrick Henry,et al.  Measuring Cosmological Parameters from the Evolution of Cluster X-Ray Temperatures , 2000, astro-ph/0002365.

[13]  U. Seljak,et al.  A Line of sight integration approach to cosmic microwave background anisotropies , 1996, astro-ph/9603033.

[14]  D. Wittman,et al.  Discovery of a Galaxy Cluster via Weak Lensing , 2001, astro-ph/0104094.

[15]  Guido Kruse,et al.  The non-Gaussian tail of cosmic-shear statistics , 1999, astro-ph/9904192.

[16]  H. M. P. Couchman,et al.  The mass function of dark matter haloes , 2000, astro-ph/0005260.

[17]  Uros Seljak,et al.  Ray-tracing Simulations of Weak Lensing by Large-Scale Structure , 1999, astro-ph/9901191.

[18]  R. Somerville,et al.  Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment , 1999, astro-ph/9908159.

[19]  M. White,et al.  The Effect of the Cosmic Web on Cluster Weak Lensing Mass Estimates , 2000, astro-ph/0005442.

[20]  R W Hockney,et al.  Computer Simulation Using Particles , 1966 .

[21]  S. White,et al.  The Structure of cold dark matter halos , 1995, astro-ph/9508025.

[22]  Y. Suto,et al.  Strong Gravitational Lensing and Velocity Function as Tools to Probe Cosmological Parameters. , 1996, astro-ph/9612074.

[23]  H. Hoekstra Astronomy and Astrophysics the Effect of Distant Large Scale Structure on Weak Lensing Mass Estimates , 2022 .

[24]  William H. Press,et al.  Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation , 1974 .

[25]  N. Kaiser,et al.  Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing , 1993 .

[26]  J. R. Bond,et al.  The statistics of cosmic background radiation fluctuations , 1987 .

[27]  B. Jain,et al.  Statistics of Dark Matter Halos from Gravitational Lensing , 1999, The Astrophysical journal.

[28]  M. White,et al.  Simulating Weak Lensing by Large-Scale Structure , 2003, astro-ph/0303555.

[29]  Ravi K. Sheth Giuseppe Tormen Large scale bias and the peak background split , 1999 .

[30]  A. Szalay,et al.  The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields , 1986 .

[31]  Y. Jing The Density Profile of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Dark Matter Halos , 1999, astro-ph/9901340.

[32]  S. White,et al.  A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , 1996, astro-ph/9611107.

[33]  Noise properties of gravitational lens mass reconstruction , 1999, astro-ph/9909160.

[34]  F. Pearce,et al.  A new parallel PM3 code for very large-scale cosmological simulations , 1998, astro-ph/9805096.