Evaluation of Neuroanatomical Training Using a 3D Visual Reality Model

As one of the more difficult components of any curricula, neuroanatomy poses many challenges to students - not only because of the numerous discrete structures, but also due to the complicated spatial relations between them, which must be learned. Traditional anatomical education uses 2D images with a focus on dissection. This approach tends to underestimate the cognitive leaps required between textbook, lecture, and dissection cases. With reduced anatomical teaching time available, and varying student spatial abilities, new techniques are needed for training. The goal of this study is to assess the improvement of trainee understanding of 3D brain anatomy, orientation, visualization, and navigation through the use of digital training regimes in comparison with current methods. Two subsets of health science and medical students were tested individually after being given a group lecture and either a pre- or post-dissection digital lab. Results suggest that exposure to a 3D digital lab may improve knowledge acquisition and understanding by the students, particularly for first time learners.

[1]  Jayanthi Venkatiah,et al.  Computer‐assisted modules to enhance the learning of anatomy by dissection , 2010, Medical education.

[2]  Piet Kommers,et al.  Optimizing conditions for computer-assisted anatomical learning , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[4]  S. Marks,et al.  The role of three‐dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[5]  T. Brennan,et al.  INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS , 2008 .

[6]  N C Broering,et al.  Computers as teachers: learning from animations. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[8]  D. J. Lowrie,et al.  Medical student retention of embryonic development: Impact of the dimensions added by multimedia tutorials , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[9]  Diane C. Calleson,et al.  The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: Are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection? , 2007, Clinical anatomy.

[10]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Guoyu Qian,et al.  Automatic testing and assessment of neuroanatomy using a digital brain atlas: Method and development of computer‐ and mobile‐based applications , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[12]  C. Hulsebosch,et al.  Status of gross anatomy in the U.S. and Canada: Dilemma for the 21st century , 1994 .

[13]  Timothy D Wilson,et al.  A head in virtual reality: Development of a dynamic head and neck model , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Effects of Knowledge and Spatial Ability on Learning from Animation , 2007 .

[15]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Web‐based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[16]  W. Cottam,et al.  Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  Robert Miller,et al.  Approaches to learning spatial relationships in gross anatomy: Perspective from wider principles of learning , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[20]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[21]  G. Regehr,et al.  Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[22]  Itiel E Dror,et al.  Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: Comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomy , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[23]  M P D'Alessandro,et al.  A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. , 1995, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[24]  K. Rochford.  Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students , 1985, Medical education.

[25]  Susan J Cunningham,et al.  Factors affecting information retention in orthodontic patients. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  S. Daniel,et al.  Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer‐generated three‐dimensional anatomical ear model , 2006, Medical education.

[27]  D. Risucci.  Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. , 2002, American journal of surgery.