The importance of syntax in a dynamic visual signal: recognition of jacky dragon displays depends upon sequence

It is well established that recognition of complex acoustic signals, such as bird song, is dependent upon the temporal ordering of signal units or syntax. Much less is known about functionally analogous visual displays. The jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) is a native Australian agamid lizard with a highly stereotyped visual display made up of three discrete motor patterns. We conducted a playback experiment using high-resolution computer animations of conspecifics to test the importance of temporal order for signal efficacy. Lizards were shown three different life-sized simulated animations of conspecific differing in their skin texture and morphology signatures ranging from highly natural to abnormal. We evaluated signal recognition and assessed the relative importance of syntax and morphology. Our results showed that signal recognition is highly sensitive to syntax and this largely determines the observers’ behavioural responses. Stimuli with abnormal texture and shape were highly effective, as long as the natural order of motor patterns was preserved. Display recognition in jacky lizards hence depends upon syntax in just the same way as temporally constrained signals in other modalities.

[1]  A. Wierzbicka Semantics: Primes and Universals , 1996 .

[2]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of syntactic communication , 2000, Nature.

[3]  Farish A. Jenkins,et al.  Three-dimensional preservation of foot movements in Triassic theropod dinosaurs , 1999, Nature.

[4]  E. Martins,et al.  Estimating ancestral states of a communicative display: a comparative study of Cyclura rock iguanas , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  B. Ballentine,et al.  Changes in song complexity correspond to periods of female fertility in blue grosbeaks (Guiraca caerulea) , 2003 .

[6]  J. Endler Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  T. Ord,et al.  Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  Kevin L. Woo,et al.  Considerations in video playback design: Using optic flow analysis to examine motion characteristics of live and computer-generated animation sequences , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Daniel A. Van Dyk,et al.  Familiar–unfamiliar discrimination based on visual cues in the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  S. Flemming,et al.  Breeding vocalizations of the piping plover (Charadrius melodus): structure, diversity, and repertoire organization , 2005 .

[15]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  R. Peters,et al.  Display response of the Jacky Dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus (Lacertilia: Agamidae), to intruders: A semi-Markovian process , 2003 .

[17]  J. Losos,et al.  Evolution of Anolis Lizard Dewlap Diversity , 2007, PloS one.

[18]  T. Ord,et al.  Tracing the origins of signal diversity in anole lizards: phylogenetic approaches to inferring the evolution of complex behaviour , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Christopher S Evans,et al.  Interactive video playback and opponent assessment in lizards , 2002, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  Kevin L. Woo,et al.  Aggressive Signal Design in the Jacky Dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus): Display Duration Affects Efficiency , 2012 .

[21]  P. Marler,et al.  Vocal syntax development in the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  William J. Smith,et al.  The Behavior of Communicating: An Ethological Approach , 1980 .

[23]  Peter Marler,et al.  The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. , 1990 .

[24]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size , 2005, Science.

[25]  C. Rowe Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Kevin L Woo Computer-generated animal model stimuli. , 2007, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[27]  C. Pytte,et al.  Organization of agonistic vocalizations in Black-chinned Hummingbirds , 1996 .

[28]  J. Stamps,et al.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in “noisy” environments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  E. Balaban,et al.  Bird song syntax: learned intraspecific variation is meaningful. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  Permissiveness in the learning and development of song syntax in swamp sparrows , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  M. Leal,et al.  Signalling displays during predator–prey interactions in a Puerto Rican anole, Anolis cristatellus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  C. Carpenter,et al.  Behavior Patterns of Three Species of Amphibolurus (Agamidae) , 1970 .

[33]  E. Balaban Cultural and Genetic Variation in Swamp Sparrows (Melospiza Georgiana) , 1988 .

[34]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  Constraints on the Structure of Combinatorial “Chick-a-dee” Calls , 1987 .

[35]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[36]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Does true syntax or simple auditory object support the role of skylark song dialect? , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  T. A. Jenssen,et al.  Evolution of Anoline Lizard Display Behavior , 1977 .

[38]  Daniel A. Van Dyk,et al.  Opponent assessment in lizards: examining the effect of aggressive and submissive signals , 2008 .

[39]  R. Shine,et al.  The adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a reptile , 2008, Nature.

[40]  C. Pytte Song organization of house finches at the edge of an expanding range , 1997 .

[41]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Selection on Long-Distance Acoustic Signals , 2003 .

[42]  M. Veith,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN THE SONG OF CRESTS AND KINGLETS (AVES: REGULUS) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  K Okanoya,et al.  Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[44]  Richard A Peters,et al.  Introductory tail-flick of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal efficacy depends upon duration , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[45]  Jennifer E. Taylor,et al.  Reproductive ecology of the jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) : an agamid lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination , 2000 .

[46]  P. Marler,et al.  The Role of Song Phonology and Syntax in Vocal Learning Preferences in the Song Sparrow, Melospiza melodia , 2010 .

[47]  R. Peters,et al.  Signaling against the Wind: Modifying Motion-Signal Structure in Response to Increased Noise , 2007, Current Biology.

[48]  Darren Burke,et al.  Motion sensitivity of the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus: random-dot kinematograms reveal the importance of motion noise for signal detection , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Emma L. Brindley,et al.  Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  G. Uetz,et al.  Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.

[52]  K. Okanoya,et al.  Perception of temporal properties in self-generated songs by Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[53]  Carl Gans,et al.  Biology of the Reptilia , 1969 .

[54]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[55]  T. A. Jenssen,et al.  Female response to filmed displays of Anolis nebulosus (Sauria, Iguanidae) , 1970 .

[56]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘Language’ by structural linguistics , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  J. Hailman,et al.  The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English , 1985 .

[58]  G. Rieucau,et al.  Efficiency of aggressive and submissive visual displays against environmental motion noise in Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) , 2013 .