Utilization, Characteristics, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With The Guidelines

Background— There are limited data on the utilization and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in contemporary practice. Methods and Results— Using data from National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With The Guidelines between 2007 and 2014, we analyzed trends in CABG utilization and hospital-level variation in CABG rates. Patients undergoing CABG during the index admission were categorized by the most common scenarios: (1) CABG only as the primary reperfusion strategy; (2) CABG after primary percutaneous coronary intervention; and (3) CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. A total of 15 145 patients (6.3% of the STEMI population) underwent CABG during the index hospitalization, with a decrease in utilization from 8.3% in 2007 to 5.4% in 2014 (trend P value <0.001). The hospital-level use of CABG in STEMI varied widely from 0.5% to 36.2% (median, 5.3%; interquartile range [IQR], 3.5%–7.8%; P value <0.001). Of all patients undergoing CABG, 45.8% underwent CABG only, 38.7% had CABG after percutaneous coronary intervention, and 8.2% CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. The median time intervals from cardiac catheterization/percutaneous coronary intervention to CABG were 23.3 hours (IQR, 3.0–70.3 hours) in CABG only, 49.7 hours (IQR, 3.2–70.3 hours) in CABG after percutaneous coronary intervention, and 56.6 hours (IQR, 22.7–96.0 hours) in CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. The Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network mortality risk scores differed modestly (median, 33; IQR, 28–40 versus median, 32; IQR, 27–38) between CABG and non-CABG patients. Patients undergoing CABG had similar in-hospital mortality rate (5.4% versus 5.1%) as those not treated with CABG. Conclusions— CABG is performed infrequently in STEMI patients during the index hospitalization, with rates declining in contemporary US practice over time. There was marked hospital-level variation in the use of CABG, and CABG was typically performed within 1 to 3 days after angiography. Observed mortality rates appear low, suggesting that CABG might be safely performed in select STEMI patients in a timely fashion.

[1]  T. Sundt,et al.  Surgical Ineligibility and Mortality Among Patients With Unprotected Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[4]  D. Weiman,et al.  Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting in acute myocardial infarction. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Linking the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry With Medicare Claims Data: Validation of a Longitudinal Cohort of Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[6]  V. Chair,et al.  ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .

[7]  G. Levine,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Circulation.

[9]  J. Spertus,et al.  Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Daniel Polsky,et al.  Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. , 2011, JAMA.

[11]  Charles Maynard,et al.  Trends in Coronary Revascularization in the United States From 2001 to 2009: Recent Declines in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volumes , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[12]  K. Alexander,et al.  Risk adjustment for in-hospital mortality of contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction: the acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) registry-get with the guidelines (GWTG) acute myocardial infarction mortality model and risk score. , 2011, American heart journal.

[13]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction , 2010, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[14]  E. Ohman,et al.  Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines). , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  A Call to ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network): A National Effort to Promote Timely Clinical Feedback and Support Continuous Quality Improvement for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[17]  M. Oz,et al.  Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  J. J. Griffin,et al.  Role of cardiac surgery in the hospital phase management of patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, American journal of surgery.