The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results.

BACKGROUND/AIMS The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is an active middle ear implant, 'direct-drive' hearing system for the treatment of hearing loss. Recently, the VSB has been applied to conductive and mixed hearing losses. The aim of this study is to evaluate aided benefit, speech recognition in quiet and noise, subjective benefits, changes in residual hearing, and medical and surgical complications in adults with conductive or mixed hearing losses implanted with the VSB using Round Window (RW) Vibroplasty. METHODS Twelve German-speaking adults participated in a single-subject, repeated measures study design comparing their performance using the VSB with their own unaided preoperative performance. Hearing performance and changes in residual hearing were assessed using routine audiometric measures, sound field thresholds, and word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise. Subjective benefits, including subjective hearing performance, device satisfaction, and quality of life were evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, the Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, respectively. RESULTS Aided hearing thresholds, word recognition at conversational levels, and sentence recognition in quiet and noise were significantly improved without significant changes in residual cochlear hearing and without major medical and surgical complications. One subject required repositioning surgery to improve transducer coupling with the RW membrane. Subjective benefit and device satisfaction were good, as were overall and general quality of life. CONCLUSION The VSB, implanted using RW vibroplasty, is a safe and effective treatment for adults with conductive and mixed hearing losses who may have few, if any, other options.

[1]  M Tos,et al.  Implantation of Electromagnetic Ossicular Replacement Device , 1994, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[2]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Integration des aktiven Mittelohrimplantates in die plastische Ohrmuschelrekonstruktion , 2007, HNO.

[3]  O. Elbrønd,et al.  Reconstruction of the ossicular chain. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[4]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[5]  V. Colletti,et al.  Minisculptured ossicle grafts versus implants: long-term results. , 1987, The American journal of otology.

[6]  A Tjellström,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[7]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995 .

[8]  Simon Parisier,et al.  Phase III Clinical Trial Results with the Vibrant Soundbridge Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device: A Prospective Controlled Multicenter Study , 2002, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy , 1996, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[10]  S. Gatehouse.  A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. , 1999, Health bulletin.

[11]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Updated surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children , 2007, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.