Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow

Abstract Experiments were performed to examine the stability of hydrocarbon-fueled flames in cavity flameholders in supersonic airflows. Methane and ethylene were burned in two different cavity configurations having aft walls ramped at 22.5° and 90°. Air stagnation temperatures were 590 K at Mach 2 and 640 K at Mach 3. Lean blowout limits showed dependence on the air mass flowrates, cavity geometry, fuel injection scheme, Mach number, and fuel type. Large differences were noted between cavity floor and cavity ramp injection schemes. Visual observations, planar laser-induced fluorescence of nitric oxide, and shadowgraph imaging were used to investigate these phenomena. Cavity ramp injection provided better performance near the lean blowout limit, whereas injection from the cavity floor resulted in more stable flames near the rich limit. Ethylene flames have a wider range of stable operations than methane in all conditions. Lean blowout limits were not significantly different between the Mach 2 and Mach 3 cases at the lean limit; however, variation in Mach number had a measurable effect near the rich limit. Fuel flowrates at ignition were much greater than the lean blowout limit, but showed similar dependence on air mass flowrate.