Implementing a regional oncology information system: approach and lessons learned.

RATIONALE Paper-based medical record systems are known to have major problems of inaccuracy, incomplete data, poor accessibility, and challenges to patient confidentiality. They are also an inefficient mechanism of record-sharing for interdisciplinary patient assessment and management, and represent a major problem for keeping current and monitoring quality control to facilitate improvement. To address those concerns, national, regional, and local health care authorities have increased the pressure on oncology practices to upgrade from paper-based systems to electronic health records. OBJECTIVES Here, we describe and discuss the challenges to implementing a region-wide oncology information system across four independent health care organizations, and we describe the lessons learned from the initial phases that are now being applied in subsequent activities of this complex project. RESULTS The need for change must be shared across centres to increase buy-in, adoption, and implementation. It is essential to establish physician leadership, commitment, and engagement in the process. Work processes had to be revised to optimize use of the new system. Culture change must be included in the change management strategy. Furthermore, training and resource requirements must be thoroughly planned, implemented, monitored, and modified as required for effective adoption of new work processes and technology. Interfaces must be established with multiple existing electronic systems across the region to ensure appropriate patient flow. Periodic assessment of the existing project structure is necessary, and adjustments are often required to ensure that the project meets its objectives. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of region-wide oncology information systems across different health practice locations has many challenges. Leadership is essential. A strong, collaborative information-sharing strategy across the region and with the supplier is essential to identify, discuss, and resolve implementation problems. A structure that supports project management and accountability contributes to success.

[1]  Ross D. Fletcher,et al.  Computerized medical records in the Department of Veterans Affairs , 2001, Cancer.

[2]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Implementing an Integrated Electronic Outcomes and Electronic Health Record Process to Create a Foundation for Clinical Practice Improvement , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[3]  Thomas R. Klumpp,et al.  Electronic Medical Records and Quality of Cancer Care , 2013, Current Oncology Reports.

[4]  D. Bates Getting in Step: Electronic Health Records and their Role in Care Coordination , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  Fredrick D. Ashbury,et al.  The Impact of Computerized Clinical Reminders on Physician Prescribing Behavior: Evidence From Community Oncology Practice , 2003, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[6]  F. Mowat,et al.  Use of electronic medical records in oncology outcomes research , 2010, ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR.

[7]  P. Raich,et al.  Antidepressant prescribing in community cancer care , 2003, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[8]  C. Kilmon,et al.  Health Care Informatics: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 2003 .

[9]  J. Kotter Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  Francis Lau,et al.  A study of information technology use and implementation of electronic medical record systems in BC medical practices , 2009 .

[11]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[12]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[13]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.