Assessment of elbow spasticity with surface electromyography and mechanomyography based on support vector machine

The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is the gold standard in clinical for grading spasticity. However, its results greatly depend on the physician evaluations and are subjective. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using support vector machine (SVM) to objectively assess elbow spasticity based on both surface electromyography (sEMG) and mechanomyography (MMG). sEMG signals and tri-axial accelerometer mechanomyography (ACC-MMG) signals were recorded simultaneously on patients' biceps and triceps when they extended or bended elbow passively. 39 post-stroke patients participated in the study, and were divided into four groups regarding MAS level (MAS=0, 1, 1+ or 2). The three types of features, root mean square (RMS), mean power frequency (MPF), and median frequency (MF), were calculated from sEMG and MMG signal recordings. Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the features and spasticity grades. The results showed that the correlation between MAS and each of the five features (MMG-RMS of the biceps, MMG-RMS of the triceps, the EMG-RMS of the biceps, EMG-RMS of the triceps, EMG-MPF of the triceps) was significant (p<0.05). The four spasticity grades were identified with SVM, and the classification accuracy of SVM with sEMG, MMG, sEMG-MMG were 70.9%, 83.3%, 91.7%, respectively. Our results suggest that using the SVM-based method with sEMG and MMG to assess elbow spasticity would be suitable for clinical management of spasticity.

[1]  Michael P Barnes,et al.  A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  C. McGibbon,et al.  Elbow spasticity during passive stretch-reflex: clinical evaluation using a wearable sensor system , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Rebecca J. Fisher,et al.  From What We Know to What We Do: Translating Stroke Rehabilitation Research into Practice , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[4]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[5]  F. Biering-Sørensen,et al.  Spasticity-assessment: a review , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[6]  L. Logan,et al.  Rehabilitation Techniques to Maximize Spasticity Management , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[8]  Kaat Desloovere,et al.  Manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessments: a systematic review of psychometric properties , 2014, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  Percy Nohama,et al.  A new approach to assess the spasticity in hamstrings muscles using mechanomyography antagonist muscular group , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[11]  Gang Huang,et al.  Application of support vector machine in cancer diagnosis , 2011, Medical oncology.

[12]  Susanna Rampichini,et al.  Novel insights into skeletal muscle function by mechanomyography: from the laboratory to the field , 2015, Sport Sciences for Health.

[13]  Kenneth Sundaraj,et al.  Longitudinal, Lateral and Transverse Axes of Forearm Muscles Influence the Crosstalk in the Mechanomyographic Signals during Isometric Wrist Postures , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  J. Patton,et al.  Movement distributions of stroke survivors exhibit distinct patterns that evolve with training , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  P Madeleine,et al.  Mechanomyography and electromyography force relationships during concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  Travis W. Beck,et al.  Mechanomyographic and electromyographic time and frequency domain responses during submaximal to maximal isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[17]  A. Thevenon,et al.  Differences in kinematic parameters and plantarflexor reflex responses between manual (Ashworth) and isokinetic mobilisations in spasticity assessment , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  H. Hermens,et al.  Neurophysiological methods for the assessment of spasticity: The Hoffmann reflex, the tendon reflex, and the stretch reflex , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Jiangang Shen,et al.  Clinical efficacy and sEMG analysis of a new traditional Chinese medicine therapy in the treatment of spasticity following apoplectic hemiparalysis , 2014, Acta Neurologica Belgica.

[20]  Percy Nohama,et al.  Advances and perspectives of mechanomyography , 2014 .

[21]  Percy Nohama,et al.  Wrist Movement Characterization by Mechanomyography Technique , 2010 .

[22]  G. Francisco,et al.  Poststroke Spasticity Management , 2012, Stroke.