The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. H. Smith. Beliefs in statements labeled fact and rumor. , 1947, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[2] The forms of support , 1950 .
[3] Holding the bag , 1950 .
[4] Howard Gilkinson,et al. Effects of order and authority in an argumentative speech , 1954 .
[5] M. Horowitz,et al. The influence of attributed motive on the acceptance of statement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[6] R. Cathcart. An experimental study of the relative effectiveness of four methods of presenting evidence , 1955 .
[7] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[8] A. Montagu. A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms , 1959 .
[9] Ernest G. Bormann,et al. An empirical approach to certain concepts of logical proof , 1961 .
[10] Effects of “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory” evidence in a speech of advocacy , 1963 .
[11] Confirmation of ethos as a confounding element in communication research , 1966 .
[12] R. K. Young,et al. Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1966 .
[13] Elliot Aronson,et al. On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .
[14] James C. McCroskey,et al. Ethos: A confounding element in communication research , 1966 .
[15] Terry H. Ostermeier. Effects of type and frequency of reference upon perceived source credibility and attitude change , 1967 .
[16] J. Mccroskey,et al. The credibility of reluctant testimony , 1967 .
[17] R. Nisbett,et al. Self-esteem and susceptibility to social influence. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[18] Judgment of Evidence , 1968 .
[19] K. Sereno. Ego‐involvement: A neglected variable in speech‐communication research , 1969 .
[20] Evidence, personality, and attitude change , 1969 .
[21] I. Warren. The effect of credibility in sources of testimony on audience attitudes toward speaker and message , 1969 .
[22] J. Kline. Interaction of evidence and readers’ intelligence on the effects of short messages , 1969 .
[23] J. Mccroskey. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .
[24] R. Wyer. Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation , 1970 .
[25] B L Brilhart. Relationships of speaker-message perception to perceptual field-independence. , 1970, The Journal of communication.
[26] Michael O. Finkelstein,et al. A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .
[27] L. Anderson. An Experimental Study of Reluctant and Biased Authority-Based Assertions , 1970 .
[28] James C. McCroskey,et al. The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter‐persuasion , 1970 .
[29] James C. McCroskey,et al. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication , 1971 .
[30] Dogmatism of the speaker and selection of evidence , 1971 .
[31] Dogmatism, persuasibility and attitude instability. , 1971, The Journal of communication.
[32] Ch. Perelman,et al. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .
[33] J. Whitehead. Effects of authority‐based assertion on attitude and credibility , 1971 .
[34] A Q‐analysis of encoding behavior in the selection of evidence , 1971 .
[35] Modern argumentation and debate : principles and practices , 1971 .
[36] V. D. Wall. Evidential attitudes and attitude change , 1972 .
[37] H. Hunt. Source Effects, Message Effects, and General Effects in Counteradvertising , 1972 .
[38] J. Mccroskey,et al. The effects of message sidedness and evidence on inoculation against counterpersuasion in small group communication , 1972 .
[39] Charles U. Larson,et al. Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility , 1973 .
[40] A. Tversky,et al. On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .
[41] J. C. Savitsky,et al. Trading emotions: Equity theory of reward and punishment. , 1974 .
[42] Helen Fleshler,et al. The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluations of speaker and message credibility , 1974 .
[43] M. Lewis-Beck. Determining the Importance of an Independent Variable: A Path Analytic Solution , 1974 .
[44] B. Florence. AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF EVIDENCE TO BELIEF SYSTEMS AND ATTITUDE CHANGE , 1975 .
[45] The process of persuasion: Principles and readings , 1975 .
[46] Eugene Borgida,et al. Attribution and the psychology of prediction. , 1975 .
[47] W. Morris,et al. Testifying in one's own defense: The ingratiator's dilemma. , 1976 .
[48] T. Harte. The effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1976 .
[49] A. Doob,et al. Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries , 1976 .
[50] Alice H. Eagly,et al. Intelligence, comprehension, and opinion change , 1976 .
[51] Timothy C. Brock,et al. Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .
[52] D. Zillmann,et al. The Persuasive Effectiveness of the Peer Appeal and a Communicator's First-Hand Experience , 1976 .
[53] H. Asher. Causal modeling , 1976 .
[54] Gary L. Wells,et al. Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions , 1977 .
[55] Dale Hample. Testing a Model of Value Argument and Evidence. , 1977 .
[56] Cary G. Mills,et al. Relationships Among Three Sources of Credibility in the Communication Configuration: Speaker, Message, and Experimenter. , 1977 .
[57] Eugene Borgida,et al. The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions , 1977 .
[58] J. Mccroskey,et al. The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility , 1978 .
[59] Effects of Withheld Evidence on Juridic Decisions , 1978 .
[60] Gary L. Wells,et al. Naive Attributors' Attributions and Predictions: What Is Informative and When Is an Effect an Effect? , 1978 .
[61] An Analysis of Evidence in the First Ford/Carter Debate. , 1978 .
[62] Lynn E. Miller,et al. Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .
[63] S. Chaiken,et al. Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .
[64] Dale Hample. Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims , 1978 .
[65] R. Lindsay,et al. Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. , 1979, The Journal of applied psychology.
[66] James J. Bradac,et al. The phenomenology of evidence: Information‐source utility in decision making , 1979 .
[67] Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence , 1979 .
[68] Factors affecting testimony about mitigating circumstances and the fixing of punishment , 1979 .
[69] Those Who Protest Too Much are Seen as Guilty , 1979 .
[70] M. Myers. Rule Departures and Making Law: Juries and Their Verdicts , 1979 .
[71] E. Borgida. Character Proof and the fireside induction , 1979 .
[72] D. C. Ugwuegbu. Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility , 1979 .
[73] F. Strack,et al. The Impact of A Discredited Key Witness , 1980 .
[74] E. Loftus. Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.
[75] Kathy Kellermann. The Concept of Evidence: A Critical Review. , 1980 .
[76] R. Lindsay,et al. Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony , 1980 .
[77] H. Hosch,et al. Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions , 1980 .
[78] Dale Hample. A Cognitive View of Argument. , 1980 .
[79] Lucy Horwitz,et al. Statistics For Social Change , 1980 .
[80] K. Williams,et al. The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. , 1980 .
[81] M. Bar-Hillel. The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .
[82] L. Wrightsman,et al. Prior Confessions and Mock Juror Verdicts , 1980 .
[83] M. Lewis-Beck. Applied Regression: An Introduction , 1980 .
[84] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .
[85] Gary L. Wells,et al. The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of Fact , 1981 .
[86] K. Williams,et al. Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .
[87] M. R. Leippe,et al. How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. , 1981 .
[88] J. Cacioppo,et al. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .
[89] R. Lindsay,et al. Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations? , 1981 .
[90] S. Harkins,et al. Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. , 1981 .
[91] Dale Hample. The cognitive context of argument , 1981 .
[92] J. Cacioppo,et al. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .
[93] L. Wrightsman,et al. Coerced Confessions, Judicial Instruction, and Mock Juror Verdicts' , 1981 .
[94] Patricia Hayes Bradley,et al. The Folk-Linguistics of Women's Speech: An Empirical Examination. , 1981 .
[95] R. Baron,et al. The Discredible Eyewitness , 1982 .
[96] Reducing the Biasing Effect of Perpetrator Attractiveness in Jury Simulation , 1982 .
[97] Shelley E. Taylor,et al. Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .
[98] J. Brigham,et al. The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications , 1983 .
[99] J. Cacioppo,et al. Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .
[100] John C. Reinard. The Role of Toulmin's Categories of Message Development in Persuasive Communication: Two Experimental Studies on Attitude Change , 1984 .
[101] Ian W. Evett. A Quantitative Theory for Interpreting Transfer Evidence in Criminal Cases , 1984 .
[102] J. Cacioppo,et al. The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .
[103] Dale Hample. Refinements on the Cognitive Model of Argument: Concreteness, Involvement and Group Scores. , 1985 .
[104] T. Govier. A practical study of argument , 1985 .
[105] Russell T. Church,et al. Values and Policies in Controversy: An Introduction to Argumentation and Debate , 1986 .
[106] James B. Stiff. Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta‐analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes , 1986 .
[107] D. D. Morley,et al. Subjective Message Constructs: A Theory of Persuasion. , 1987 .
[108] Kim B. Walker,et al. The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change , 1987 .
[109] A. Collins. Introduction to Reasoning , 1988 .