The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research

This article presents a review of the development of research on the persuasive effects of evidence. Focusing on research dealing with the impact of evidence on persuasive communication, this review makes three related arguments. First, past claims about the inconsistency in evidence research are largely mistaken when testimonial assertion evidence is involved; second, the conditions under which evidence should produce maximal effects can be understood by reference to Petty and Cacioppo's Elaboration Likelihood Model; finally, persuasive effects are surprisingly consistent across evidence types when careful comparison of operational definitions, rather than conclusions, is undertaken.

[1]  G. H. Smith Beliefs in statements labeled fact and rumor. , 1947, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  The forms of support , 1950 .

[3]  Holding the bag , 1950 .

[4]  Howard Gilkinson,et al.  Effects of order and authority in an argumentative speech , 1954 .

[5]  M. Horowitz,et al.  The influence of attributed motive on the acceptance of statement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  R. Cathcart An experimental study of the relative effectiveness of four methods of presenting evidence , 1955 .

[7]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[8]  A. Montagu A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms , 1959 .

[9]  Ernest G. Bormann,et al.  An empirical approach to certain concepts of logical proof , 1961 .

[10]  Effects of “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory” evidence in a speech of advocacy , 1963 .

[11]  Confirmation of ethos as a confounding element in communication research , 1966 .

[12]  R. K. Young,et al.  Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1966 .

[13]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .

[14]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  Ethos: A confounding element in communication research , 1966 .

[15]  Terry H. Ostermeier Effects of type and frequency of reference upon perceived source credibility and attitude change , 1967 .

[16]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The credibility of reluctant testimony , 1967 .

[17]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Self-esteem and susceptibility to social influence. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Judgment of Evidence , 1968 .

[19]  K. Sereno Ego‐involvement: A neglected variable in speech‐communication research , 1969 .

[20]  Evidence, personality, and attitude change , 1969 .

[21]  I. Warren The effect of credibility in sources of testimony on audience attitudes toward speaker and message , 1969 .

[22]  J. Kline Interaction of evidence and readers’ intelligence on the effects of short messages , 1969 .

[23]  J. Mccroskey A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .

[24]  R. Wyer Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation , 1970 .

[25]  B L Brilhart Relationships of speaker-message perception to perceptual field-independence. , 1970, The Journal of communication.

[26]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .

[27]  L. Anderson An Experimental Study of Reluctant and Biased Authority-Based Assertions , 1970 .

[28]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The effects of evidence as an inhibitor of counter‐persuasion , 1970 .

[29]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication , 1971 .

[30]  Dogmatism of the speaker and selection of evidence , 1971 .

[31]  Dogmatism, persuasibility and attitude instability. , 1971, The Journal of communication.

[32]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[33]  J. Whitehead Effects of authority‐based assertion on attitude and credibility , 1971 .

[34]  A Q‐analysis of encoding behavior in the selection of evidence , 1971 .

[35]  Modern argumentation and debate : principles and practices , 1971 .

[36]  V. D. Wall Evidential attitudes and attitude change , 1972 .

[37]  H. Hunt Source Effects, Message Effects, and General Effects in Counteradvertising , 1972 .

[38]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The effects of message sidedness and evidence on inoculation against counterpersuasion in small group communication , 1972 .

[39]  Charles U. Larson,et al.  Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility , 1973 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[41]  J. C. Savitsky,et al.  Trading emotions: Equity theory of reward and punishment. , 1974 .

[42]  Helen Fleshler,et al.  The influence of field dependence, speaker credibility set, and message documentation on evaluations of speaker and message credibility , 1974 .

[43]  M. Lewis-Beck Determining the Importance of an Independent Variable: A Path Analytic Solution , 1974 .

[44]  B. Florence AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF EVIDENCE TO BELIEF SYSTEMS AND ATTITUDE CHANGE , 1975 .

[45]  The process of persuasion: Principles and readings , 1975 .

[46]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Attribution and the psychology of prediction. , 1975 .

[47]  W. Morris,et al.  Testifying in one's own defense: The ingratiator's dilemma. , 1976 .

[48]  T. Harte The effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1976 .

[49]  A. Doob,et al.  Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries , 1976 .

[50]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Intelligence, comprehension, and opinion change , 1976 .

[51]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[52]  D. Zillmann,et al.  The Persuasive Effectiveness of the Peer Appeal and a Communicator's First-Hand Experience , 1976 .

[53]  H. Asher Causal modeling , 1976 .

[54]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions , 1977 .

[55]  Dale Hample Testing a Model of Value Argument and Evidence. , 1977 .

[56]  Cary G. Mills,et al.  Relationships Among Three Sources of Credibility in the Communication Configuration: Speaker, Message, and Experimenter. , 1977 .

[57]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions , 1977 .

[58]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility , 1978 .

[59]  Effects of Withheld Evidence on Juridic Decisions , 1978 .

[60]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Naive Attributors' Attributions and Predictions: What Is Informative and When Is an Effect an Effect? , 1978 .

[61]  An Analysis of Evidence in the First Ford/Carter Debate. , 1978 .

[62]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .

[63]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[64]  Dale Hample Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims , 1978 .

[65]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. , 1979, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  James J. Bradac,et al.  The phenomenology of evidence: Information‐source utility in decision making , 1979 .

[67]  Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence , 1979 .

[68]  Factors affecting testimony about mitigating circumstances and the fixing of punishment , 1979 .

[69]  Those Who Protest Too Much are Seen as Guilty , 1979 .

[70]  M. Myers Rule Departures and Making Law: Juries and Their Verdicts , 1979 .

[71]  E. Borgida Character Proof and the fireside induction , 1979 .

[72]  D. C. Ugwuegbu Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility , 1979 .

[73]  F. Strack,et al.  The Impact of A Discredited Key Witness , 1980 .

[74]  E. Loftus Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[75]  Kathy Kellermann The Concept of Evidence: A Critical Review. , 1980 .

[76]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony , 1980 .

[77]  H. Hosch,et al.  Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions , 1980 .

[78]  Dale Hample A Cognitive View of Argument. , 1980 .

[79]  Lucy Horwitz,et al.  Statistics For Social Change , 1980 .

[80]  K. Williams,et al.  The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. , 1980 .

[81]  M. Bar-Hillel The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[82]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Prior Confessions and Mock Juror Verdicts , 1980 .

[83]  M. Lewis-Beck Applied Regression: An Introduction , 1980 .

[84]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[85]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of Fact , 1981 .

[86]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[87]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. , 1981 .

[88]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[89]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations? , 1981 .

[90]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. , 1981 .

[91]  Dale Hample The cognitive context of argument , 1981 .

[92]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[93]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Coerced Confessions, Judicial Instruction, and Mock Juror Verdicts' , 1981 .

[94]  Patricia Hayes Bradley,et al.  The Folk-Linguistics of Women's Speech: An Empirical Examination. , 1981 .

[95]  R. Baron,et al.  The Discredible Eyewitness , 1982 .

[96]  Reducing the Biasing Effect of Perpetrator Attractiveness in Jury Simulation , 1982 .

[97]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[98]  J. Brigham,et al.  The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications , 1983 .

[99]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[100]  John C. Reinard The Role of Toulmin's Categories of Message Development in Persuasive Communication: Two Experimental Studies on Attitude Change , 1984 .

[101]  Ian W. Evett A Quantitative Theory for Interpreting Transfer Evidence in Criminal Cases , 1984 .

[102]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[103]  Dale Hample Refinements on the Cognitive Model of Argument: Concreteness, Involvement and Group Scores. , 1985 .

[104]  T. Govier A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[105]  Russell T. Church,et al.  Values and Policies in Controversy: An Introduction to Argumentation and Debate , 1986 .

[106]  James B. Stiff Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta‐analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes , 1986 .

[107]  D. D. Morley,et al.  Subjective Message Constructs: A Theory of Persuasion. , 1987 .

[108]  Kim B. Walker,et al.  The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change , 1987 .

[109]  A. Collins Introduction to Reasoning , 1988 .