Empirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis.

There are many options in handling microarray data that can affect study conclusions, sometimes drastically. Working with a two-color platform, this study uses ten spike-in microarray experiments to evaluate the relative effectiveness of some of these options for the experimental goal of detecting differential expression. We consider two data transformations, background subtraction and intensity normalization, as well as six different statistics for detecting differentially expressed genes. Findings support the use of an intensity-based normalization procedure and also indicate that local background subtraction can be detrimental for effectively detecting differential expression. We also verify that robust statistics outperform t-statistics in identifying differentially expressed genes when there are few replicates. Finally, we find that choice of image analysis software can also substantially influence experimental conclusions.

[1]  Ingrid Lönnstedt.  Replicated microarray data , 2001 .

[2]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t -test and statistical inferences of gene changes , 2001, Bioinform..

[3]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  T. Speed,et al.  Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Charles L. Kooperberg,et al.  Improved Background Correction for Spotted DNA Microarrays , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF A GENE EXPRESSION MICROARRAY EXPERIMENT WITH REPLICATION , 2002 .

[8]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[9]  X. Cui,et al.  Transformations for cDNA Microarray Data , 2003, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[10]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A benchmark for Affymetrix GeneChip expression measures , 2004, Bioinform..

[11]  D. Allison,et al.  Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology , 2004, Nature Genetics.