Patterns and dynamics of users' behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community

This research draws on longitudinal network data from an online community to examine patterns of users’ behavior and social interaction, and infer the processes underpinning dynamics of system use. The online community represents a prototypical example of a complex evolving social network in which connections between users are established over time by online messages. We study the evolution of a variety of properties since the inception of the system, including how users create, reciprocate, and deepen relationships with one another, variations in users’ gregariousness and popularity, reachability and typical distances among users, and the degree of local redundancy in the system. Results indicate that the system is a “small world”characterized by the emergence, in its early stages,of a hub-dominated structure with heterogeneity in users’ behavior. We investigate whether hubs are responsible for holding the system together and facilitating information flow, examine first-mover advantages underpinning users’ability to rise to system prominence, and uncover gender differences in users’ gregariousness, popularity, and local redundancy. We discuss the implications of the results for research on system use and evolving social networks, and for a host of applications, including information diffusion, communities of practice, and the security and robustness of information systems.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Z. Neda,et al.  Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks , 2001, cond-mat/0104131.

[3]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[9]  Valerie Alia.  Talking Difference: On Gender and Language , 1997 .

[10]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[13]  Steven G. Jones,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[15]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[16]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[17]  A. Rapoport.  Spread of information through a population with socio-structural bias: I. Assumption of transitivity , 1953 .

[18]  J. Davis.  Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations: Testing Two Graph Theoretical Models on 742 Sociomatrices , 1970 .

[19]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[20]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[21]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[22]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Managers Doing Leadership: The Extra-Ordinarization of the Mundane , 2003 .

[23]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[24]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[25]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Search in Power-Law Networks , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  J. Berger.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[32]  S. Feld.  The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW , 2004 .

[34]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Explaining Clustering in Social Networks: Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Cascading Benefits , 2006 .

[35]  Downloaded from , 1997 .

[36]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[38]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Prominence and control: the weighted rich-club effect. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[39]  D. Watts.  The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[40]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  P. Killworth,et al.  Studying social relations cross-culturally , 1988 .

[42]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[43]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[44]  Tel Amiel,et al.  Individual differences in Internet usage motives , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[46]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[47]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Email, Gender, and Personal Relationships , 2008 .

[49]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Proximity , 1985 .

[50]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[51]  Roger V. Gould.  The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[53]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[54]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[55]  Albert,et al.  Topology of evolving networks: local events and universality , 2000, Physical review letters.

[56]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Decay functions , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[57]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[58]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[59]  Xerox,et al.  The Small World , 1999 .

[60]  W. Andrew Taylor,et al.  Computer-mediated knowledge sharing and individual user differences: an exploratory study , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[62]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[63]  Thomas J. Fararo,et al.  A study of a biased friendship net , 1964 .

[64]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[65]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Sex differences versus social processes in the construction of gender , 2006 .

[66]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[67]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[68]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[69]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups , 1955 .

[70]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[71]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[72]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[73]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[74]  S. Redner,et al.  Connectivity of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[75]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Scale-Free Networks , 2007 .

[76]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[77]  P. Holland,et al.  A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  A. Rapoport,et al.  A study of a large sociogram II. Elimination of free parameters , 2007 .

[79]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[80]  Michael J. Stern,et al.  HOW LOCALITY, FREQUENCY OF COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET USAGE AFFECT MODES OF COMMUNICATION WITHIN CORE SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[81]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[82]  Terrill L. Frantz,et al.  Communication Networks from the Enron Email Corpus “It's Always About the People. Enron is no Different” , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[83]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Evolution and structure of the Internet , 2004 .

[84]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Living Networked On and Offline , 1999 .

[85]  M Girvan,et al.  Structure of growing social networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[86]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style , 2007, MIS Q..

[87]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[88]  P. Bolton,et al.  The firm as a communication network , 1994 .

[89]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[90]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com , 2001 .

[91]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  A random graph model for massive graphs , 2000, STOC '00.

[92]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[93]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[94]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Did distance matter before the Internet?: Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[95]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[96]  Jeffrey Boase,et al.  PERSONAL NETWORKS AND THE PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM , 2008 .

[97]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[98]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[99]  Petter Holme,et al.  Structure and time evolution of an Internet dating community , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[100]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[101]  Alex Arenas,et al.  The real communication network behind the formal chart: Community structure in organizations , 2006 .

[102]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Models for network evolution , 1996 .

[103]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[104]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[105]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  The Structure of the Web , 2001, Science.

[106]  P. Ingram,et al.  Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[107]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.