Reimagining Gamification through the Lens of Activity Theory

Gamification is maturing as an academic research object, but still suffers from growing pains. Challenges identified in a practical gamification activity are used to anchor a discussion of theoretical challenges currently facing gamification. We argue that some of the pain can be attributed to the exceptionalist and formalist definitions of game, and believe that these interpretations assume a dualistic ontological perspective of the world, resulting in problematic dichotomies. An alternative dialectical perspective from which to reimagine gamification and address some of the challenges is offered. This perspective is concretized through the lens of activity theory. The value of applying activity theory is illustrated by reflecting back on the practical and theoretical challenges identified. Reimagining gamification has the potential to afford participants with greater opportunities for action, and also to drive transformation of existing practices and thus enable agency. It is captured by considering it as an expansive cycle of activity.

[1]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[2]  J. Huizinga.  Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[3]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Player Types: A Meta-synthesis , 2014, Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc..

[4]  J. Raessens.  Playful Identities, or the Ludification of Culture , 2006, Games Cult..

[5]  Jaakko Stenros.  Playfulness, Play, and Games: A Constructionist Ludology Approach , 2015 .

[6]  T. L. Taylor,et al.  Book Review: T.L. Taylor, Play Between WorldS: Exploring Online Game Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. vii+197 pp. ISBN 0262201631, $29.95 hbk , 2007, New Media Soc..

[7]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[8]  Thomas M. Malaby.  Beyond Play , 2007 .

[9]  Jaakko Stenros.  In Defence of a Magic Circle: The Social, Mental and Cultural Boundaries of Play , 2014, Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc..

[10]  E. Deci.  Cognitive Evaluation Theory: Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation , 1975 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[12]  Juho Hamari,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Why Do People Use Gamification Services? , 2022 .

[13]  R. Landers.  Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning , 2014 .

[14]  Tim Marsh,et al.  Activity-Based Scenario Design, Development and Assessment in Serious Games , 2010 .

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  J. Dewey.  The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology , 2011 .

[17]  Jesper Juul,et al.  The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness , 2010, DiGRA Conference.

[18]  Jaakko Stenros,et al.  In Defence of a Magic Circle: The Social and Mental Boundaries of Play , 2012 .

[19]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Gamification in theory and action: A survey , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Eudaimonic Design, or: Six Invitations to Rethink Gamification , 2014 .

[22]  Player Types and Gamification , 2011 .

[23]  P. Vittoz.  Man , 1962, Bloom.

[24]  Jaakko Stenros,et al.  Playing the system: using frame analysis to understand online play , 2010, Future Play.

[25]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2007 .

[26]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[27]  Amy K. Landers,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Theory of Gamified Learning , 2014 .

[28]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Elizabeth Schroeder.  Activity , 2005 .

[31]  Steffen P. Walz,et al.  Behind Games: Playful Mindsets and Transformative Practices , 2014 .

[32]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation , 2000 .

[33]  Steffen P. Walz,et al.  Why Gamification is Bullshit , 2014 .

[34]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[35]  Yrjö Engeström.  Learning by Expanding: The Zone of Proximal Development as the Basic Category of Expansive Research , 2014 .

[36]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Introduction , 1999 .

[37]  de Cornelis Vey Mestdagh,et al.  Learning in a virtual world , 2009 .

[38]  Tom Boellstorff,et al.  A Ludicrous Discipline? Ethnography and Game Studies , 2006, Games Cult..

[39]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[40]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  Terminological Ambiguity , 2009 .

[41]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[42]  Siobhan O'Donovan,et al.  A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course , 2013, SAICSIT '13.

[43]  S. Reiss.  Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation at 30: Unresolved scientific issues , 2005, The Behavior analyst.

[44]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[45]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective , 2012, MindTrek.

[46]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model , 2011 .

[47]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft , 2009 .

[48]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..