Prostate localization from abdominal ultrasound images by using a two-level approach

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequent cancers among men. Abdominal ultrasound scans are very practical alternatives to more precise but inconvenient transrectal ultrasound scans for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. However, detection of the prostate region alone is very difficult for the abdominal ultrasound images. This paper uses a prostate detection method that models the abdominal images as the classes of neighboring anatomical regions of the prostate. The method has two levels: Pixel level detection assigns class scores to each pixel in the image. Model level detection uses these scores to determine the final positions of the anatomical regions in transverse and sagittal images. This approach is very effective for the specific problems of the abdominal ultrasound scans. Extensive experiments performed on real patient data with and without pathologies produce very promising results.

[1]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  F F Yin,et al.  A three-dimensional deformable model for segmentation of human prostate from ultrasound images. , 2001, Medical physics.

[3]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Desire Sidibé,et al.  A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[5]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[6]  Ayse Betül Oktay,et al.  Prostate detection from abdominal ultrasound images: A part based approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[7]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Segmentation of abdominal ultrasound images of the prostate using a priori information and an adapted noise filter. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[8]  Aymeric Histace,et al.  Boundary Delineation in Prostate Imaging Using Active Contour Segmentation Method with Interactively Defined Object Regions , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[9]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[10]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Efficient 3D Endfiring TRUS Prostate Segmentation with Globally Optimized Rotational Symmetry , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.