Ju l 2 00 1 The multi-fractal structure of contrast changes in natural images : from sharp edges to textures

We present a formalism that leads very naturally to a hierarchical description of the different contrast structures in images, providing precise definitions of sharp edges and other texture components. Within this formalism, we achieve a decomposition of pixels of the image in sets, the fractal components of the image, such that each set only contains points characterized by a fixed stregth of the singularity of the contrast gradient in its neighborhood. A crucial role in this description of images is played by the behavior of contrast differences under changes in scale. Contrary to naive scaling ideas where the image is thought to have uniform transformation properties (Field 1987), each of these fractal components has its own transformation law and scaling exponents. A conjecture on their biological relevance is also given. Neural Computation 12, 763-793 (2000) E-mail: amturiel@delta.ft.uam.es To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: parga@delta.ft.uam.es

[1]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Ralph Linsker,et al.  Self-organization in a perceptual network , 1988, Computer.

[4]  Kenneth Falconer,et al.  Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications , 1990 .

[5]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Singularity detection and processing with wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Roberto Benzi,et al.  A random process for the construction of multiaffine fields , 1993 .

[8]  Succi,et al.  Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[9]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[10]  Raffaele Tripiccione,et al.  Extended self-similarity in the dissipation range of fully developed turbulence , 1993 .

[11]  E. Bacry,et al.  Singularity spectrum of fractal signals from wavelet analysis: Exact results , 1993 .

[12]  D. Ruderman The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[13]  Novikov,et al.  Infinitely divisible distributions in turbulence. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[14]  She,et al.  Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[15]  Roberto Benzi,et al.  On the scaling of three-dimensional homogeneous and isotropic turbulence , 1995 .

[16]  She,et al.  Quantized energy cascade and log-Poisson statistics in fully developed turbulence. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[17]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Wavelet analysis of fractals: from the mathematical concepts to experimental reality , 1996 .

[18]  B. Castaing,et al.  The temperature of turbulent flows , 1996 .

[19]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Nadal,et al.  Self-Similarity Properties of Natural Images Resemble Those of Turbulent Flows , 1998, cond-mat/0107314.

[21]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998 .

[22]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.