Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert

When cows on dairy farms are milked with an automatic milking system or in high capacity milking parlors, clinical mastitis (CM) cannot be adequately detected without sensors. The objective of this paper is to describe the performance demands of sensor systems to detect CM and evaluats the current performance of these sensor systems. Several detection models based on different sensors were studied in the past. When evaluating these models, three factors are important: performance (in terms of sensitivity and specificity), the time window and the similarity of the study data with real farm data. A CM detection system should offer at least a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 99%. The time window should not be longer than 48 hours and study circumstances should be as similar to practical farm circumstances as possible. The study design should comprise more than one farm for data collection. Since 1992, 16 peer-reviewed papers have been published with a description and evaluation of CM detection models. There is a large variation in the use of sensors and algorithms. All this makes these results not very comparable. There is a also large difference in performance between the detection models and also a large variation in time windows used and little similarity between study data. Therefore, it is difficult to compare the overall performance of the different CM detection models. The sensitivity and specificity found in the different studies could, for a large part, be explained in differences in the used time window. None of the described studies satisfied the demands for CM detection models.

[1]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Somatic cell count assessment at the quarter or cow milking level. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  W Steeneveld,et al.  Discriminating between true-positive and false-positive clinical mastitis alerts from automatic milking systems. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  L. C. van der Gaag,et al.  Simplify the interpretation of alert lists for clinical mastitis in automatic milking systems , 2010 .

[5]  M Brandt,et al.  Invited review: technical solutions for analysis of milk constituents and abnormal milk. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  N. Friggens,et al.  Quantifying degree of mastitis from common trends in a panel of indicators for mastitis in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  S. Samarasinghe,et al.  Detection of mastitis and its stage of progression by automatic milking systems using artificial neural networks , 2009, Journal of Dairy Research.

[8]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis and lameness detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic , 2009 .

[9]  RW Claycomb,et al.  An automated in-line clinical mastitis detection system using measurement of conductivity from foremilk of individual udder quarters , 2009, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[10]  Richard O'Kennedy,et al.  Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  Rik van der Tol,et al.  Using sensor data patterns from an automatic milking system to develop predictive variables for classifying clinical mastitis and abnormal milk , 2008 .

[13]  R. Huirne,et al.  The influence of cow factors on the incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks , 2008 .

[15]  T. Lam,et al.  Costs of mastitis: facts and perception , 2008, Journal of Dairy Research.

[16]  T. Larsen,et al.  Estimating degree of mastitis from time-series measurements in milk: a test of a model based on lactate dehydrogenase measurements. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Analysing serial data for mastitis detection by means of local regression , 2007 .

[18]  Alisa Rudnitskaya,et al.  Evaluation of a novel chemical sensor system to detect clinical mastitis in bovine milk. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review , 2007, The Veterinary quarterly.

[20]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic , 2006 .

[21]  T. Larsen,et al.  A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  M. Rasmussen,et al.  Visual scoring of clots in foremilk , 2005, Journal of Dairy Research.

[23]  M. Rasmussen,et al.  Visual scoring of milk mixed with blood , 2005, Journal of Dairy Research.

[24]  M. Walmsley,et al.  Chemical and rheological aspects of gel formation in the California Mastitis Test , 2005, Journal of Dairy Research.

[25]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Sensors and management support in high-technology milking. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[27]  J. Hillerton,et al.  Effective treatment of Streptococcus uberis clinical mastitis to minimize the use of antibiotics. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  W Ouweltjes,et al.  Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[29]  R M de Mol,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic in automated cow status monitoring. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  T Fearn,et al.  Near-infrared spectroscopy for dairy management: measurement of unhomogenized milk composition. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  G. H. Kroeze,et al.  Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalman filter , 1999 .

[32]  G. H. Kroeze,et al.  Results of a multivariate approach to automated oestrus and mastitis detection , 1997 .

[33]  J. Hillerton,et al.  The effects of early antibiotic treatment following diagnosis of mastitis detected by a change in the electrical conductivity of milk. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  P. Dejmek,et al.  Heat induced aggregation of b-lactoglobulin studied by dynamic light scattering , 1996 .

[35]  M. Nielen,et al.  Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  A. Brand,et al.  Application of a neural network to analyse on-line milking parlour data for the detection of clinical mastitis in dairy cows , 1995 .

[37]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Knowledge Representation Methods for Dairy Decision Support Systems , 1994 .

[38]  M. Nielen,et al.  Electrical conductivity of milk: measurement, modifiers, and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  P. H. Hogewerf,et al.  The efficacy of in-line measurement of quarter milk electrical conductivity, milk yield and milk temperature for the detection of clinical and subclinical mastitis , 1992 .

[40]  Gail Silkwood Animal identification , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[41]  B J Kitchen,et al.  Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests , 1981, Journal of Dairy Research.

[42]  R. W. Sims Animal Identification , 1980 .

[43]  J. Gowen,et al.  ON THE MECHANISM OF MILK SECRETION , 1931, The Journal of general physiology.

[44]  I. Lūsis,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF SOMATIC CELL COUNT DETERMINATION IN THE MILKING ROBOTS , 2010 .

[45]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Decision-tree induction to detect clinical mastitis with automatic milking , 2010 .

[46]  Fernando Mazeris,et al.  DeLaval Herd Navigator® Proactive Herd Management , 2010 .

[47]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: analytical issues and guidelines , 2008 .

[48]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: would the real gold standard please stand up? , 2008 .

[49]  Mieke Uyttendaele,et al.  Wageningen Academic Publishers , 2005 .

[50]  Alois Knoll,et al.  A Method to Detect Flakes and Clots in Milk in Automatic Milking Systems , 2004 .

[51]  R. M. de Mol,et al.  DETECTION OF ESTRUS AND MASTITIS: FIELD PERFORMANCE OF A MODEL , 2001 .

[52]  Douglas G. Dalgleish,et al.  Dynamic light scattering: applications to food systems , 1995 .

[53]  B. Kitchen Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. , 1981, The Journal of dairy research.

[54]  M. Paape,et al.  Leukocytes--second line of defense against invading mastitis pathogens. , 1979, Journal of dairy science.

[55]  H. Hogeveen Mastitis therapy and control : automatic on-line detection of abnormal milk , 1973 .