Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox☆

[1]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. , 1988 .

[2]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Quick Analysis for Busy Decision Makers , 1984 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[5]  P. Slovic.  Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. , 1969 .

[6]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Effects of independent and dependent outcome values upon bets. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  W. Fellner.  Distortion of Subjective Probabilities as a Reaction to Uncertainty , 1961 .

[8]  N. Feather,et al.  Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty. , 1959, Psychological review.

[9]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[10]  F. W. Irwin,et al.  Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes. , 1953, Journal of personality.

[11]  R. W. Marks,et al.  The effect of probability, desirability, and "privilege" on the stated expectations of children. , 1951, Journal of personality.

[12]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1988 .

[13]  B. Cohen.  The Effect of Outcome Desirability on Comparisons of Numerical and Linguistic Probabilities , 1986 .

[14]  Alf Zimmer,et al.  Verbal Vs. Numerical Processing of Subjective Probabilities , 1983 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking , 1976 .