The impacts of assimilating satellite soil moisture into a rainfall-runoff model in a semi-arid catchment

Summary Soil moisture plays a key role in runoff generation processes, and the assimilation of soil moisture observations into rainfall–runoff models is regarded as a way to improve their prediction accuracy. Given the scarcity of in situ measurements, satellite soil moisture observations offer a valuable dataset that can be assimilated into models; however, very few studies have used these coarse resolution products to improve rainfall–runoff model prediction. In this work we evaluate the assimilation of satellite soil moisture into the probability distributed model (PDM) for the purpose of reducing flood prediction uncertainty in an operational context. The surface soil moisture (SSM) and the soil wetness index (SWI) derived from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) are assimilated using an ensemble Kalman filter. Two options for the observed data are considered to remove the systematic differences between SSM/SWI and the model soil moisture prediction: linear regression (LR) and anomaly-based cumulative distribution function (aCDF) matching. In addition to a complete period rescaling scheme (CP), an operationally feasible real-time rescaling scheme (RT) is tested. On average, the discharge prediction uncertainty, expressed as the ensemble mean of the root mean squared difference (MRMSD), is reduced by 25% after assimilation and little overall difference is found between the various approaches. However, when specific flood events are analysed, the level of improvement varies. Our results reveal that efficacy of the soil moisture assimilation for flood prediction is robust with respect to different assumptions regarding the observation error variance. The assimilation performs similarly between the operational RT and the CP schemes, which suggests that short-term training is sufficient to effectively remove observation biases. Regarding the different rescaling techniques used, aCDF matching consistently leads to better assimilation results than LR. Differences between the assimilation of SSM and SWI, however, are not significant. Even though there is improvement in streamflow prediction, the assimilation of soil moisture shows limited capability in error correction when there exists a large bias in the peak flow prediction. Findings of this work imply that proper pre-processing of observed soil moisture is critical for the efficacy of the data assimilation and its performance is affected by the quality of model calibration.

[1]  R. Moore The PDM rainfall-runoff model , 2007 .

[2]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation , 2001 .

[3]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Dual Forcing and State Correction via Soil Moisture Assimilation for Improved Rainfall–Runoff Modeling , 2014 .

[4]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[5]  M. Borga,et al.  Detecting threshold hydrological response through satellite soil moisture data , 2013 .

[6]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture , 2004 .

[7]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Impact of Incorrect Model Error Assumptions on the Sequential Assimilation of Remotely Sensed Surface Soil Moisture , 2006 .

[8]  G. Lannoy,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of model state variables and observation and forecast biases using a two-stage hybrid Kalman filter , 2012 .

[9]  Thomas R. H. Holmes,et al.  An evaluation of AMSR–E derived soil moisture over Australia , 2009 .

[10]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Assimilation of Surface- and Root-Zone ASCAT Soil Moisture Products Into Rainfall–Runoff Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An improved approach for estimating observation and model error parameters in soil moisture data assimilation , 2010 .

[12]  Yann Kerr,et al.  SMOS: The Mission and the System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  The MATLAB genetic algorithm toolbox , 1995 .

[14]  T. McMahon,et al.  Conceptual catchment scale rainfall-runoff models and AGCM land-surface parameterisation schemes , 1996 .

[15]  Dongryeol Ryu,et al.  Correcting Unintended Perturbation Biases in Hydrologic Data Assimilation , 2009 .

[16]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[17]  W. Wagner,et al.  Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe , 2011 .

[18]  Derek Karssenberg,et al.  The suitability of remotely sensed soil moisture for improving operational flood forecasting , 2013 .

[19]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Antecedent Wetness Conditions based on ERS scatterometer data in support to rainfall-runoff modeling , 2009 .

[20]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation , 2008 .

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Evolution of ensemble data assimilation for uncertainty quantification using the particle filter‐Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2012 .

[22]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Inter-comparison of microwave satellite soil moisture retrievals over the Murrumbidgee Basin, southeast Australia , 2013 .

[23]  C. Albergel,et al.  From near-surface to root-zone soil moisture using an exponential filter: an assessment of the method based on in-situ observations and model simulations , 2008 .

[24]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Observation operators for the direct assimilation of TRMM microwave imager retrieved soil moisture , 2005 .

[25]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations , 2012 .

[26]  K. Loague,et al.  How runoff begins (and ends): Characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale , 2013 .

[27]  K. Beven Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[28]  W. Wagner,et al.  Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product , 2010 .

[29]  Victor Koren,et al.  Assimilation of streamflow and in situ soil moisture data into operational distributed hydrologic models: Effects of uncertainties in the data and initial model soil moisture states , 2011 .

[30]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An ensemble Kalman filter dual assimilation of thermal infrared and microwave satellite observations of soil moisture into the Noah land surface model , 2012 .

[31]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Hydrological real-time modelling in the Zambezi river basin using satellite-based soil moisture and rainfall data , 2011 .

[32]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Role of Subsurface Physics in the Assimilation of Surface Soil Moisture Observations , 2009 .

[33]  R. Jeu,et al.  Multisensor historical climatology of satellite‐derived global land surface moisture , 2008 .

[34]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall‐runoff partitioning , 2005 .

[35]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[36]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  The Optimality of Potential Rescaling Approaches in Land Data Assimilation , 2013 .

[37]  D. Jones,et al.  High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia , 2009 .

[38]  W. Wagner,et al.  A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data , 1999 .

[39]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[40]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Assessment of model uncertainty for soil moisture through ensemble verification , 2006 .

[41]  A. W. Western,et al.  Impact of observation error structure on satellite soil moisture assimilation into a rainfall-runoff model , 2013 .

[42]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation , 2007 .

[43]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[44]  Catherine Ottlé,et al.  Sequential Assimilation of ERS-1 SAR Data into a Coupled Land Surface–Hydrological Model Using an Extended Kalman Filter , 2003 .

[45]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Improvement of TOPLATS‐based discharge predictions through assimilation of ERS‐based remotely sensed soil moisture values , 2002, Hydrological Processes.

[46]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[47]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals , 2008 .

[48]  K. Loague Rainfall-Runoff Modelling , 2010 .

[49]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Improving hydrologic predictions of a catchment model via assimilation of surface soil moisture , 2011 .

[50]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Implementation of surface soil moisture data assimilation with watershed scale distributed hydrological model , 2012 .

[51]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles , 2004 .

[52]  L. A. Richards Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums , 1931 .