Generalizing face quality and factor measures to video

Methods for assessing the impact of factors and image-quality metrics for still face images are well-understood. The extension of these factors and quality measures to faces in video has not, however, been explored. We present a specific methodology for carrying out this extension from still to video. Using the Point-and-Shoot Challenge (PaSC) dataset, our study investigates the effect of nine factors on three face recognition algorithms, and identifies the most important factors for algorithm performance in video. We also evaluate four factor metrics for characterizing a single video as well as two comparative metrics for pairs of videos. For video-based face recognition, the analysis shows that distribution-based metrics are generally more effective in quantifying factor values than algorithm-dependent metrics. For predicting face recognition performance in video, we observe that the face detection confidence and face size factors are potentially useful quality measures. From our data, we also find that males are easier to identify than females, and Asians easier to identify than Caucasians. Finally, for this PaSC video dataset, face recognition algorithm performance is primarily driven by environment and sensor factors.

[1]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  A meta-analysis of face recognition covariates , 2009, 2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems.

[2]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  How features of the human face affect recognition: a statistical comparison of three face recognition algorithms , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[3]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  The challenge of face recognition from digital point-and-shoot cameras , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[4]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Beyond One Still Image : Face Recognition from Multiple Still Images or Video Sequence , 2004 .

[5]  James J. Filliben,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for biometric systems: A methodology based on orthogonal experiment designs , 2012, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  Ken-ichi Maeda,et al.  Face recognition using temporal image sequence , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[7]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Focus on quality, predicting FRVT 2006 performance , 2008, 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition.

[8]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition challenge problem , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[9]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  On the existence of face quality measures , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[10]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Gang Hua,et al.  The IJCB 2014 PaSC video face and person recognition competition , 2014, IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics.

[12]  Rayford B. Vaughn,et al.  Information assurance measures and metrics - state of practice and proposed taxonomy , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[13]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Principal Angles Separate Subject Illumination Spaces in YDB and CMU-PIE , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.