Using Enterprise Information Architecture Methods to Model Wicked Problems in Information Systems Design Research

Design Science is the process of solving ‘wicked problems’ through designing, developing, instantiating, and evaluating novel solutions (Hevner, March, Park and Ram, 2004). Wicked problems are described as agent finitude in combination with problem complexity and normative constraint (Farrell and Hooker, 2013). In Information Systems Design Science, determining that problems are ‘wicked’ differentiates Design Science research from Solutions Engineering (Winter, 2008) and is a necessary part of proving the relevance to Information Systems Design Science research (Hevner, 2007; Iivari, 2007). Problem complexity is characterised as many problem components with nested, dependent and co-dependent relationships interacting through multiple feedback and feed-forward loops. Farrell and Hooker (2013) specifically state for wicked problems “it will often be impossible to disentangle the consequences of specific actions from those of other co-occurring interactions”. This paper discusses the application of an Enterprise Information Architecture modelling technique to disentangle the wicked problem complexity for one case. It proposes that such a modelling technique can be applied to other wicked problems and can lay the foundations for proving relevancy to DSR, provide solution pathways for artefact development, and aid to substantiate those elements required to produce Design Theory.

[1]  P. E. Abernethy,et al.  One District's Quality Improvement Story. , 1992 .

[2]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[3]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[4]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Understanding the Philosophical Underpinnings of Software Engineering Research in Information Systems , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[5]  Rob Gleasure,et al.  What Is a ‘Wicked Problem’ for IS Research? , 2013 .

[6]  N.F.M. Roozenburg,et al.  A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences , 1991 .

[7]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[8]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[9]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[14]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[15]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[17]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[18]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Multi‐models of quality in education , 1997 .

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A new social contract for research , 1997, CACM.

[21]  P. Checkland Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Soft design science methodology , 2009, DESRIST.

[25]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  The Design Science Research Roadmap: In Progress Evaluation , 2013, PACIS.

[26]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[27]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[28]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[29]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Evaluation Risks in Design Science Research: A Framework , 2008 .

[31]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling design processes , 1990 .

[33]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Beyond calculation - the next fifty years of computing , 1997 .

[34]  Roman Beck,et al.  Theory-generating design science research , 2013, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[35]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[36]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[37]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[38]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Design, science and wicked problems , 2013 .

[39]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The computer scientist as toolsmith II , 1996, CACM.

[40]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research , 2008 .

[41]  Judy McKay,et al.  The design construct in information systems design science , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  G. Berry Towards Quality Systems Development in NSW Public Schools , 2002 .

[43]  D. Tsichritzis The dynamics of innovation , 1997 .

[44]  Barnett Berry Getting "Real" About Teaching Effectiveness and Teacher Retention , 2010 .

[45]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[46]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[47]  Bernard Robertson-Dunn A Problem Oriented Enterprise Architecture Approach Applied to Wicked Problems , 2012 .

[48]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..