Laser Vibrometry-Based Precise Measurement of Tape-Shaped Tethers Damping Ratio Toward Space Applications

To mitigate the growing problem of space debris, current international guidelines require spacecraft in low Earth orbit (LEO) to implement post-mission disposal strategies to be deorbited within 25 years from the end of their operative life. Electrodynamic tethers (EDTs) are an effective and promising option for deorbiting as they do not require fuel consumption. However, the success of this new technology also depends on the dynamic stability of thin tape-shaped tethers during both deployment and deorbiting phases. This is where precise measurement of damping characteristics of thin tape-shaped tethers comes in. This article presents an innovative experimental setup and analysis methods for precisely measuring the damping ratio of a thin (thickness 50 $\mu \text{m}$ ) tape-shaped tether made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) intended for use in EDT applications. To capture longitudinal oscillations during dynamic tests, we employed a laser vibrometer and explored four different methods of experimental data analysis, comparing and describing them in detail in this article. We also conducted an uncertainty analysis in line with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). The experimental results show good agreement among the four methods used to estimate the damping ratio with the most precise method involving nonlinear regression applied to all the experimental data. A Monte Carlo (MC) analysis was carried out considering the most significant sources of uncertainty. The smallest uncertainty interval is ±1% of the estimated damping ratio, with a 95% confidence level, using this method.

[1]  M. Pertile,et al.  Measurement of mechanical characteristics of tape tethers for space applications , 2022, 2022 IEEE 9th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace).

[2]  E. Lorenzini,et al.  Validation of enabling technologies for deorbiting devices based on electrodynamic tethers , 2022, Acta Astronautica.

[3]  M. Tajmar,et al.  Deorbit kit demonstration mission , 2022, Journal of Space Safety Engineering.

[4]  E. Lorenzini,et al.  Impact risk assessment of deorbiting strategies in Low Earth Orbits , 2021, ASCEND 2021.

[5]  E. Lorenzini,et al.  Space tethers: parameters reconstructions and tests , 2021, 2021 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace).

[6]  Lorenzo Olivieri,et al.  Deployment requirements for deorbiting electrodynamic tether technology , 2021, CEAS Space Journal.

[7]  J. Opiela,et al.  Evolution of ISO's space debris mitigation standards , 2020 .

[8]  T. Hanada,et al.  Impact on collision probability by post mission disposal and active debris removal , 2020 .

[9]  T. Masson-Zwaan,et al.  The Peaceful Uses of Outer Space , 2019, The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Treaties.

[10]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  ReDSHIFT: A Global Approach to Space Debris Mitigation , 2018, Aerospace.

[11]  Kanjuro Makihara,et al.  Structural Evaluation for Electrodynamic Tape Tethers Against Hypervelocity Space Debris Impacts , 2018 .

[12]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Risk to space sustainability from large constellations of satellites , 2016 .

[13]  Arif Goektug Karacalioglu,et al.  The Impact of New Trends in Satellite Launches on Orbital Debris Environment , 2016 .

[14]  A. Francesconi,et al.  Survivability to orbital debris of tape tethers for end-of-life spacecraft de-orbiting , 2016 .

[15]  Luciano Anselmo,et al.  Compliance of the Italian satellites in low Earth orbit with the end-of-life disposal guidelines for Space Debris Mitigation and ranking of their long-term criticality for the environment , 2015 .

[16]  Stefano Debei,et al.  SPARTANS - A cooperating spacecraft testbed for autonomous proximity operations experiments , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.

[17]  Kouta Kunugi,et al.  Modeling of tape tether vibration and vibration sensing using smart film sensors , 2015 .

[18]  Francesco Branz,et al.  Active Debris Multi-Removal Mission Concept Based on Hybrid Propulsion , 2014 .

[19]  R. Mantellato,et al.  Two-bar model for free vibrations damping of space tethers by means of spring-dashpot devices , 2014 .

[20]  J. P. Arenas,et al.  Comparison of four test methods to measure damping properties of materials by using piezoelectric transducers , 2011 .

[21]  Matthew S. Allen,et al.  A new method for processing impact excited continuous-scan laser Doppler vibrometer measurements , 2010 .

[22]  D. Milašinović Rheological-dynamical analogy: Prediction of damping parameters of hysteresis damper , 2007 .

[23]  Eric Langford,et al.  Quartiles in Elementary Statistics , 2006 .

[24]  M. L. Cosmo,et al.  Tethers in Space Handbook , 1997 .

[25]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Bare wire anodes for electrodynamic tethers , 1993 .

[26]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  A Study on PMD Device for Microsatellites Using Electrodynamic Tether , 2021 .

[27]  Lorenzo Olivieri,et al.  Large constellations assessment and optimization in LEO space debris environment , 2020 .

[28]  G. Sánchez-Arriaga,et al.  Modeling and Performance of Electrodynamic Low-Work-Function Tethers with Photoemission Effects , 2018 .

[29]  Francesco Branz,et al.  SURVAVIBILITY TO HYPERVELOCITY IMPACTS OF ELECTRODYNAMIC TAPE TETHERS FOR DEORBITING SPACECRAFT IN LEO , 2013 .

[30]  Wim Van Paepegem,et al.  Practical aspects in measuring vibration damping of materials , 2012 .

[31]  Hisashi Osumi,et al.  Development of a system for measuring structural damping coefficients , 2001 .

[32]  E. Iso Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1993 .

[33]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Shock and vibration handbook , 1976 .

[34]  Iverson C. Bell,et al.  Analyzing Miniature Electrodynamic Tether Propulsion Capabilities and the Interaction with the Low Earth Orbit – Plasma Environment , 2022 .