'wicked projects': The Australian experience
暂无分享,去创建一个
Karin Garrety | Ian McLoughlin | Andrew Dalley | Rob Wilson | Ping Yu | A. Dalley | Robert Yu | Rob Wilson | K. Garrety | I. McLoughlin
[1] Patrick Dunleavy,et al. Australian e-Government in comparative perspective , 2008 .
[2] Ian Patrick McLoughlin,et al. Digital Government at Work: A Social Informatics Perspective , 2013 .
[3] Rainu Kaushal,et al. Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[4] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.
[5] Louise Fitzgerald,et al. Making Wicked Problems Governable?: The Case of Managed Networks in Health Care , 2013 .
[6] B. Head. Wicked Problems in Public Policy , 2008 .
[7] C. Schoen,et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. , 2012, Health affairs.
[8] H. Rittel,et al. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .
[9] N. Stafford. Germany set to introduce electronic patient cards despite doctors’ opposition , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[10] Anthony King,et al. The Blunders of Our Governments , 2013 .
[11] Moira Paterson. HealthConnect and privacy: a policy conundrum. , 2004, Journal of law and medicine.
[12] Karin Garrety,et al. National electronic health record systems as 'wicked projects': The Australian experience , 2016, Inf. Polity.
[13] S. Duckett,et al. The Australian Health Care System , 2004 .
[14] Michael R Kidd,et al. A call for national e‐health clinical safety governance , 2012, The Medical journal of Australia.
[15] Ian Patrick McLoughlin,et al. Disruptive Innovation in Health Care: Business Models, Moral Orders and Electronic Records , 2013, Social Policy and Society.
[16] M. C. Ploem,et al. Understanding health care providers' reluctance to adopt a national electronic patient record: an empirical and legal analysis. , 2013, Medicine and law.
[17] Patrick Kierkegaard,et al. Interoperability after deployment: persistent challenges and regional strategies in Denmark. , 2015, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[18] C. Flood. International Health Care Reform: A Legal, Economic and Political Analysis , 1999 .
[19] Robin Williams,et al. The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User , 2005 .
[20] B. Flyvbjerg,et al. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .
[21] S. Shaw,et al. Fragmentation: A wicked problem with an integrated solution? , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.
[22] Patrick Dunleavy,et al. Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government , 2007 .
[23] Marion J Ball,et al. Personal health records: empowering consumers. , 2007, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.
[24] Robin Gauld,et al. Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-government, Computer Failure and Information System Development , 2006 .
[25] H. Tsoukas. Craving for generality and small-N studies : a Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and management studies , 2009 .
[26] W. Currie. Health it policy in the UK: the case of electronic health records , 2013 .
[27] Wendy L. Currie,et al. A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: Some policy and research directions , 2014, Inf. Manag..
[28] C. Paton. Garbage‐can Policy‐making Meets Neo‐liberal Ideology: Twenty Five Years of Redundant Reform of the English National Health Service , 2014 .