Assessment of combined movements of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic and low back pain subjects using a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system.

Combined movement examination (CME) is used by physiotherapists to assess and treat patients with low back pain (LBP). However, this method has not been subjected to quantitative assessment. The purpose of this study was to discover if CME of the lumbar spine could be measured with acceptable intra-examiner reliability and to make a preliminary investigation of the effect of LBP on the results of CME. Combined movement examination of the human thoracolumbar spine was measured using a three-dimensional electromagnetic goniometer (3SPACE Fastrak Polhemus, Colchester, Vermont, USA). 1. Intra-examiner reliability of CME was evaluated using a test-retest design; examination was repeated in 23 subjects without LBP and 16 with LBP. 2. A sample of 31 subjects without LBP and 23 subjects with LBP underwent CME, which involved measuring right and left sideflexion in the flexed, neutral and extended position. Pearson's r and the intraclass correlation coefficient for all variables ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 (P < 0.05). A MANOVA test (P < 0.05), comparing the combined effects of the two variables for each position, was used to test for a difference between the positions attained by the subjects with LBP and those without. Generally LBP subjects showed smaller ranges of movement than those without LBP. Each position was recorded as a degree of rotation around the x-axis (flexion/extension) and around the y-axis (left and right sideflexion). CME can be carried out with acceptable intra-examiner reliability; preliminary evidence is presented concerning the effectiveness of CME in identifying reduced spinal movement in LBP subjects.

[1]  J. Duthie.  Rheumatology and rehabilitation. , 1972, British medical journal.

[2]  M. Haas,et al.  Interexaminer Reliability and Discriminant Validity of Inclinometric Measurement of Lumbar Rotation in Chronic Low-Back Pain Patients and Subjects Without Low-Back Pain , 1992, Spine.

[3]  M. Haas,et al.  Statistical methodology for reliability studies. , 1991, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[4]  A. Stoddard.  Manual of Osteopathic Technique , 1959 .

[5]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[6]  B. Edwards.  Combined movements of the lumbar spine: examination and clinical significance. , 1979, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[7]  M. V. Krause.  Food, Nutrition and Diet Therapy , 1958, Diabetes.

[8]  E. Chao,et al.  Justification of triaxial goniometer for the measurement of joint rotation. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  G. Mellin.  Correlations of Spinal Mobility with Degree of Chronic Low Back Pain after Correction for Age and Anthropometric Factors , 1987, Spine.

[10]  F. David,et al.  Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta-Variables. , 1960 .

[11]  L. Twomey,et al.  Sideflexion induced lumbar spine conjunct rotation and its influencing factors. , 1993, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[12]  B. Elliott,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of lumbar spine kinematics for fast bowlers in cricket. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  L. Brown.  An Introduction to the Treatment and Examination of the Spine by Combined Movements , 1988 .

[14]  J. Anderson,et al.  The relationships between little-finger mobility, lumbar mobility, straight-leg raising, and low-back pain. , 1974, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[15]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Measurement of human back movements in three dimensions by opto-electronic devices. , 1987, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Michael Rose.  The Statistical Analysis of the Intra-observer Repeatability of Four Clinical Measurement Techniques , 1991 .

[17]  P. J. Mayer,et al.  Analysis of spine motion variability using a computerized goniometer compared to physical examination. A prospective clinical study. , 1994, Spine.

[18]  H. Woltring.  3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D G Wilder,et al.  The Relationship Between Anthropometric, Postural, Muscular, and Mobility Characteristics of Males Ages 18–55 , 1985, Spine.

[20]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Rotational mobility of the human back in forward flexion. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[21]  L. Swärd,et al.  Anthropometric Characteristics, Passive Hip Flexion, and Spinal Mobility in Relation to Back Pain in Athletes , 1990, Spine.

[22]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human back. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  J. Troup,et al.  1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: The Perception of Back Pain and the Role of Psychophysical Tests of Lifting Capacity , 1987, Spine.

[24]  T. Mayer,et al.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. , 1984, Spine.