Power and Categorization

Across three experiments, participants formed a larger number of categories when in a state of high, compared to low, psychological power. Moreover, in contrast to prior categorization research, which suggests forming more categories is tantamount to reduced breadth of categorization, high-power participants also formed a larger number of superordinate (i.e., more abstract) categories than low-power participants. The present findings enhance the understanding of power in relation to categorization and simultaneously highlight the distinction between number and abstraction as fundamental aspects of categorization.

[1]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. , 2015 .

[2]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  The Social Distance Theory of Power , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Lowering the Pitch of Your Voice Makes You Feel More Powerful and Think More Abstractly , 2012 .

[4]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Power Increases Social Distance , 2012 .

[5]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Power, stability of power, and creativity , 2011 .

[6]  Li Huang,et al.  Powerful Postures Versus Powerful Roles , 2011, Psychological science.

[7]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Categories Create Mind-Sets: The Effect of Exposure to Broad versus Narrow Categorizations on Subsequent, Unrelated Decisions , 2010 .

[8]  Rebecca W. Hamilton,et al.  Categorization by groups and individuals , 2010 .

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[10]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Power Differences in the Construal of a Crisis: The Immediate Aftermath of September 11, 2001 , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  N. Roese,et al.  Preference Invites Categorization , 2008, Psychological science.

[12]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: a model of general action and inaction goals. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Dacher Keltner,et al.  Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions , 2008 .

[15]  Daniël H. J. Wigboldus,et al.  Abstract thinking increases one's sense of power , 2008 .

[16]  S. Kinoshita,et al.  Congruence Effect in Semantic Categorization with Masked Primes with Narrow and Broad Categories. , 2008 .

[17]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[18]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Shopping Goals, Goal Concreteness, and Conditional Promotions , 2006 .

[19]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[21]  Jack Block,et al.  The Cognitive Style of Breadth of Categorization : Longitudinal Consistency of Personality Correlates , 2005 .

[22]  A. Kiefer,et al.  Power and Impression Formation: The Effects of Power on the Desire for Morality and Competence Information , 2004 .

[23]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Patrick Shafto,et al.  Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Y. Trope,et al.  The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. , 2002 .

[27]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Upending the Status Quo: Cognitive Complexity in U.S. Supreme Court Justices Who Overturn Legal Precedent , 2000 .

[30]  J. Förster,et al.  The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Communication Strategy, and Integrative Complexity in Groups: Public versus Private Reactions to Majority and Minority Status , 1998 .

[32]  Emilie L. Lin,et al.  The Effects of Prior Processing Episodes on Basic level Superiority , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  D. Medin,et al.  Categorization and Reasoning among Tree Experts: Do All Roads Lead to Rome? , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  A. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different : The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[35]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. , 1995 .

[36]  Harish Sujan,et al.  The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. , 1990 .

[37]  Mario Mikulincer,et al.  Anxiety and categorization—1. The structure and boundaries of mental categories , 1990 .

[38]  M. Mikulincer,et al.  Anxiety and categorization—2. Hierarchical levels of mental categories , 1990 .

[39]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  L. R. Goldberg.  The validity of rating procedures to index the hierarchical level of categories , 1986 .

[41]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of affect on categorization. , 1984 .

[42]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Harry E. Pople,et al.  The Formation of Composite Hypotheses in Diagnostic Problem Solving: An Exercise in Synthetic Reasoning , 1977, IJCAI.

[44]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[47]  P M Wortman,et al.  Medical diagnosis: an information-processing approach. , 1972, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[48]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .