A residual correction method for high-resolution PET reconstruction with application to on-the-fly Monte Carlo based model of positron range.

PURPOSE The quality of tomographic images is directly affected by the system model being used in image reconstruction. An accurate system matrix is desirable for high-resolution image reconstruction, but it often leads to high computation cost. In this work the authors present a maximum a posteriori reconstruction algorithm with residual correction to alleviate the tradeoff between the model accuracy and the computation efficiency in image reconstruction. METHODS Unlike conventional iterative methods that assume that the system matrix is accurate, the proposed method reconstructs an image with a simplified system matrix and then removes the reconstruction artifacts through residual correction. Since the time-consuming forward and back projection operations using the accurate system matrix are not required in every iteration, image reconstruction time can be greatly reduced. RESULTS The authors apply the new algorithm to high-resolution positron emission tomography reconstruction with an on-the-fly Monte Carlo (MC) based positron range model. Computer simulations show that the new method is an order of magnitude faster than the traditional MC-based method, whereas the visual quality and quantitative accuracy of the reconstructed images are much better than that obtained by using the simplified system matrix alone. CONCLUSIONS The residual correction method can reconstruct high-resolution images and is computationally efficient.

[1]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Compensation of spatial system response in SPECT with conjugate gradient reconstruction technique. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  R. Laforest,et al.  Positron range modeling for statistical PET image reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[4]  J. A. Parker,et al.  Modeling and simulation of positron range effects for high resolution PET imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Effect of errors in the system matrix on maximum a posteriori image reconstruction , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Dan Xu,et al.  Detection of gamma ray polarization using a 3D position sensitive CdZnTe detector , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[7]  Lin Fu,et al.  A novel iterative image reconstruction method for high-resolution PET Imaging with a Monte Carlo based positron range model , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[8]  P. Khurd,et al.  A globally convergent regularized ordered-subset EM algorithm for list-mode reconstruction , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Acceleration of Monte Carlo SPECT simulation using convolution-based forced detection , 1999 .

[11]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Efficient fully 3-D iterative SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Multigrid tomographic inversion with variable resolution data and image spaces , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Jae-Seung Kim,et al.  Impact of system design parameters on image figures of merit for a mouse PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  M E Phelps,et al.  Effect of positron range on spatial resolution. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Blanco Positron Range Effects on the Spatial Resolution of RPC-PET , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Dual matrix ordered subsets reconstruction for accelerated 3D scatter compensation in single-photon emission tomography , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Fast projectors for iterative 3D PET reconstruction , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[18]  Keishi Kitamura,et al.  Transaxial system models for jPET-D4 image reconstruction , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Fang Xu,et al.  Accelerating popular tomographic reconstruction algorithms on commodity PC graphics hardware , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  An accelerated convergent ordered subsets algorithm for emission tomography , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Lin Fu,et al.  A residual correction method for iterative reconstruction with inaccurate system model , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[22]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  Nonlinear multigrid methods of optimization in Bayesian tomographic image reconstruction , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[23]  R.M. Leahy,et al.  Evaluation of MAP image reconstruction with positron range modeling for 3D PET , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[24]  C.A. Bouman,et al.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998 .

[26]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  S. Derenzo,et al.  Application of mathematical removal of positron range blurring in positron emission tomography , 1990 .

[28]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Pragmatic fully 3D image reconstruction for the MiCES mouse imaging PET scanner. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Stephen E. Derenzo,et al.  Mathematical Removal of Positron Range Blurring in High Resolution Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[30]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Positron range and coincidence non-collinearity in SimSET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[31]  L. MacDonald,et al.  Spatially variant positron range modeling derived from CT for PET image reconstruction , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[32]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[33]  Michael J. Welch,et al.  MicroPET imaging with non-conventional isotopes , 2001 .

[34]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[35]  I Buvat,et al.  Fully 3D Monte Carlo reconstruction in SPECT: a feasibility study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Frans van der Have,et al.  System Calibration and Statistical Image Reconstruction for Ultra-High Resolution Stationary Pinhole SPECT , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Iterative tomographic image reconstruction using Fourier-based forward and back-projectors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Yiping Shao,et al.  Acceleration of SimSET photon history generation , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[39]  S. Cherry,et al.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Gengsheng Lawrence Zeng,et al.  Unmatched projector/backprojector pairs in an iterative reconstruction algorithm , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  Matthew R. Palmer,et al.  Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important positron emitters , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[42]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Scatter correction for positron emission mammography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  J. Terry,et al.  Three-dimensional iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and geometric point response correction , 1990 .

[44]  Jing Tang,et al.  Analytic system matrix resolution modeling in PET: an application to Rb-82 cardiac imaging , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[45]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Inverse Monte Carlo: A Unified Reconstruction Algorithm for SPECT , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[46]  E C Frey,et al.  Fast implementations of reconstruction-based scatter compensation in fully 3D SPECT image reconstruction. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[48]  D R Gilland,et al.  Approximate 3D iterative reconstruction for SPECT. , 1997, Medical physics.