Analysis of Technological Innovation from Business Economics and Management

An in-depth review examines the main approachesused by business economics and management in the study of technologicalinnovation by firms. These five approaches include industrial organization,transaction costs economy, positive agency theory, resource-based view, andevolution theory. Within the industrial organization approach, emphasis is placed on theeffect of external factors to the firm. The theory of a transaction costseconomy focuses on the exchange of intangible assets (e.g., technology). Thepositive agency theory comes from two factors: differences of interest amongindividuals, and existence of uncertainty and information asymmetries. Theprimary concern of the resource-based view is the internal analysis ofinnovation, particularly intangible assets. Technological change and innovationare found to be the main features of the evolutionary theory. Each framework emphasizes a particular aspect of the innovation process, andare therefore somewhat complementary. Two broader, and therefore perhapsmore useful,models emerge from a review of these approaches: (1)industrial organization and (2) evolution. The evolutionary theory is the chiefapproach currentlyused for innovation analysis, and is deemed to be anappropriate theoretical framework for future empirical research, when informedby specific aspects of other views. (NEE)

[1]  Stefano Paleari,et al.  The Provision of Finance to Innovation: A Survey Conducted among Italian Technology-based Small Firms , 2000 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[4]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[5]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[6]  Thomas A. Turk,et al.  Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy , 1991 .

[7]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Search, Learning and Accumulation of Technological Competences; The Case of Optoelectronics , 1994 .

[8]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversified expansion by large established firms , 1991 .

[9]  Hein Schreuder,et al.  Economic Approaches to Organizations , 1993 .

[10]  Robert W. Holthausen,et al.  The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring , 1983 .

[11]  R. Kolodny,et al.  The FASB, the SEC, and R&D , 1981 .

[12]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[13]  Philip G. Berger.  EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT TAX EFFECTS OF THE RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT , 1993 .

[14]  M. Perlman,et al.  Evolving technology and market structure : studies in Schumpeterian economics , 1991 .

[15]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Self-Financing of an R & D Project , 1976 .

[16]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards A Synthesis , 2012 .

[17]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[18]  John Roberts,et al.  The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited , 1998 .

[19]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[20]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  An Exploration of Common Ground: Integrating Evolutionary and Strategic Theories of the Firm , 1995 .

[21]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[22]  A. Carmeli,et al.  High- and low-performance firms: do they have different profiles of perceived core intangible resources and business environment? , 2001 .

[23]  Johan Hauknes.  Norwegian Input-Output Clusters and Innovation Patterns , 1998 .

[24]  L. Magnusson.  Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics , 1994 .

[25]  C. Hill,et al.  Are institutional investors myopic? A time‐series study of four technology‐driven industries , 1991 .

[26]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Declining U.S. Competitiveness: Reflections on a Crisis , 1988 .

[27]  D. Audretsch.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1995 .

[28]  Svein Ulset.  R&D outsourcing and contractual governance: An empirical study of commercial R&D projects , 1996 .

[29]  D. Teece.  The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[30]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[31]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[32]  Rongxin Chen,et al.  Technological Expansion: the Interaction Between Diversification Strategy and Organizational Capability , 1996 .

[33]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Termination outcomes of research alliances , 2005 .

[34]  R. Hall.  The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[35]  J. Hennart,et al.  A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures , 1988 .

[36]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[37]  A. Alchian,et al.  The Firm Is Dead; Long Live the Firm A Review of Oliver E. Williamson s The Economic Institutions of Capitalism* , 1988 .

[38]  Devendra Sahal.  A theory of evolution of technology , 1979 .

[39]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation , 2002 .

[40]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[41]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[42]  G. Walker,et al.  A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions , 1984 .

[43]  D. Ravenscraft,et al.  LBOs, debt and R&D intensity , 1993 .

[44]  C. Watanabe,et al.  Technology spillover as a complement for high-level R&D intensity in the pharmaceutical industry , 2002 .

[45]  David J. Teece,et al.  Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering, and Licensing Decisions , 1988 .

[46]  Isabel Suárez González,et al.  A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities , 1999 .

[47]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[48]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Knowledge, innovative activities and industrial evolution , 2000 .

[49]  G. Dosi,et al.  Evolutionary Regimes and Industrial Dynamics , 1994 .

[50]  P. Bierly,et al.  Analyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach , 2001 .

[51]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Basic Research and Industrial Innovation , 1995 .

[52]  T. Koga.  Firm size and R&D tax incentives , 2003 .

[53]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Towards a theory of the technology-based firm 1 Paper originally presented at the workshop on `Techn , 1998 .

[54]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[55]  Gregory B. Merrill,et al.  The effect of compensation program and structure on sbu competitive strategy: A study of technology‐intensive firms , 1991 .

[56]  Ulrich Kaiser.  Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches , 2002 .

[57]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D , 1980 .

[58]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[59]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[60]  Patricia M. Norman.  Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristics , 2002 .

[61]  Carlota Perez,et al.  Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems , 1983 .

[62]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[63]  R. M. Hall,et al.  A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage , 1993 .

[64]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[65]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[66]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[67]  Noel P. Greis,et al.  Absorptive capacity and new product development , 2001 .

[68]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[69]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .

[70]  M. Polanyi.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[71]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[72]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s , 1985 .

[73]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in Collaborative R&D: A New Role for Government , 1995 .

[74]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[75]  Roland Helm,et al.  Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: an empirical study , 2004 .

[76]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[77]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Multiproduct Firms , 1989 .

[78]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .

[79]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[80]  E. Mason.  Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem , 1957 .

[81]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[82]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Perspectives on evolutionary theory , 1991 .

[83]  N. S. Siddharthan.  Transaction costs, technology transfer, and in-house R&D : A study of the Indian private corporate sector , 1992 .

[84]  Ira Horowitz,et al.  Firm Size and Research Activity , 1962 .

[85]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[86]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[87]  David J. Teece,et al.  Design Issues for Innovative Firms: Bureaucracy, Incentives and Industrial Structure * , 1999 .

[88]  O. Williamson.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[89]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[90]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[91]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The objectives of technology policy , 1987 .

[92]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[93]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[94]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[95]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry , 2003 .

[96]  G. Dosi.  Technical Change and Industrial Transformation , 1984 .

[97]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Economic Sources of Inventive Activity , 1962, The Journal of Economic History.

[98]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .