The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market

We propose a framework for understanding how the Internet has affected the U.S. political news market. The framework is driven by the lower cost of production for online news and consumers' tendency to seek out media that conform to their own beliefs. The framework predicts that consumers of Internet news sources should hold more extreme political views and be interested in more diverse political issues than those who solely consume mainstream television news. We test these predictions using two large datasets with questions about news exposure and political views. Generally speaking, we find that consumers of generally left‐of‐center (right‐of‐center) cable news sources who combine their cable news viewing with online sources are more liberal (conservative) than those who do not. We also find that those who use online news content are more likely than those who consume only television news content to be interested in niche political issues.

[1]  Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2003 .

[2]  Jonathan S. Morris.  Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes* , 2007 .

[3]  Don E. Waldman,et al.  Product Differentiation , 2006 .

[4]  Christian Sandvig,et al.  Attention to Counter-Attitudinal Messages in a State Election Campaign , 2001 .

[5]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[6]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Media Bias and Reputation , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  D. A. Jones,et al.  The Polarizing Effect of New Media Messages , 2002 .

[8]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[9]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Polarization in Media Use , 2007 .

[10]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  New Media and American Politics , 1998 .

[11]  J. Rauch,et al.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News , 2006 .

[12]  H. Hotelling.  Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[13]  Mike Allen,et al.  Selective Exposure and Dissonance after Decisions , 2002, Psychological reports.

[14]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11 , 2007 .

[15]  G. Bettega,et al.  [Bad news!]. , 2008, Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale.

[16]  M. Just.  Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[17]  M. Prior,et al.  Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections , 2003 .

[18]  Jonathan S. Morris.  The Fox News Factor , 2005 .

[19]  David Tewksbury.  Exposure to the Newer Media in a Presidential Primary Campaign , 2006 .

[20]  John Dimmick,et al.  Competition Between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension , 2004 .

[21]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting , 2006 .

[22]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure , 2008 .

[23]  R. Lipsey,et al.  Chapter 12 Product differentiation , 1989 .

[24]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Measure of Media Bias , 2005 .

[25]  H. Clements,et al.  iPOLL Databank2009113iPOLL Databank. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut Last visited October 2008. See review for pricing information URL: www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/ , 2009 .