A study on ontology structure matching

In an E-Commerce environment with appeals in efficiency, the ontology constituted by Mobile Message and the time spent on conveying messages to appropriate users, will attract a high degree of attention. Nonetheless current study environment still lacks significant exploration in this field. In view of this, the study established mobile message template using Generally in the field of ontology, much emphasis is placed on how to apply ontology information; whereas few studies explore the efficacy of matching while more emphasize on how to match with respect to ontology matching. Under current mobile-commerce environment, the content of messages conveyed by shops mostly renders in texts. Consequently efficiency becomes the most important key to consideration. This article will conduct structural similarity matching through ontology structure, exploring the efficacies generated via different methods, and matching the two types of traditional ontology: Performance assessment was conducted using Breadth-First-Matching (BFM), Depth-First-Matching (DFM) and Node-Index-Matching (NIM) proposed by the study, in order to determine the most suitable method based on the numbers of matching. The experimental data showed that Node-Index-Matching (NIM) proposed by the study had significantly optimal performance on efficacy assessment, which consequently is more suitable for use in mobile environment with large quantity of messages.

[1]  Jorge García Duque,et al.  A flexible semantic inference methodology to reason about user preferences in knowledge-based recommender systems , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Silvana Castano,et al.  On the Ontology Instance Matching Problem , 2008, 2008 19th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[3]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  On the spanning hypothesis for EDI semantics , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[4]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OilEd: a Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web , 2001, Description Logics.

[5]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  A network equilibrium framework for Internet advertising: Models, qualitative analysis, and algorithms , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Hyoil Han,et al.  A survey on ontology mapping , 2006, SGMD.

[7]  Michael Piasecki,et al.  Ontology based web simulation system for hydrodynamic modeling , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[8]  Sung Joo Park,et al.  MONERS: A news recommender for the mobile web , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Evaluating Instance-based Matching of Web Directories , 2008, WebDB.

[10]  F. Heylighen (Meta)systems as constraints on variation— a classification and natural history of metasystem transitions , 1995 .

[11]  Wan-Shiou Yang,et al.  A location-aware recommender system for mobile shopping environments , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Soe-Tsyr Yuan,et al.  A recommendation mechanism for contextualized mobile advertising , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[14]  Rubo Zhang,et al.  Research on Ontology Matching Approach in Semantic Web , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Internet Computing in Science and Engineering.

[15]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[16]  Michael Hehenberger,et al.  Text-based knowledge discovery: search and mining of life-sciences documents. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[17]  Borys Omelayenko RDFT: A Mapping Meta-Ontology for Business Integration , 2003 .